Proceedings of the International Conference on Current Issues in Education (ICCIE 2023)

Quality Analysis of Physics Questions in Class 10 High School with Iteman 4.0: Case Study

Authors
Rosidah1, *, Risky Setiawan1, Zafrullah1, Annisa Fitriani1, Ersa Mayola2
1Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
2Madrasah Aliyah Pivate Madani, Riau Islands, Indonesia
*Corresponding author. Email: rosipradanarh2124@gmail.com
Corresponding Author
Rosidah
Available Online 20 May 2024.
DOI
10.2991/978-2-38476-245-3_22How to use a DOI?
Keywords
Analysis; Question Quality; Classical Test Theory; Physics
Abstract

One way to measure learning success is through assessment activities, which require analysis as an important step to ensure the quality of the evaluation tools used. This analysis is needed to ensure that the evaluation tool is effective in measuring learning achievement and assists in assessing the success of the educational process. This research aims to examine the quality of the Final Semester Assessment questions in Physics at one of the Madrasah Aliyah schools in Tanjung Pinang, Riau Islands Province, Indonesia in the form of item analysis. The data used in this research are end-of-semester assessment questions, answer keys, and student responses obtained through document analysis techniques. Data were analyzed using Iteman 4.0 to determine the level of difficulty of the questions, the discriminating power of the questions, and the effectiveness of distractors. Based on the research findings, several important findings were identified regarding the level of difficulty of the questions, discrimination of the questions, and the effectiveness of distractors. It was found that 50% of the questions had a very easy level of difficulty, while the other 50% had a medium level of difficulty. However, it is worth noting that the majority of questions had poor item discrimination (55%), with only 10% of questions having moderate item discrimination and 35% having good item discrimination. Meanwhile, the effectiveness of distractors is also a concern, where 55% of distractors are considered ineffective, 43% are considered quite effective, and only 2% are considered effective. Based on these findings, it is recommended to make improvements to questions with a very easy level of difficulty and consider improving item discrimination and distractors to improve the quality of the evaluation tool.

Copyright
© 2024 The Author(s)
Open Access
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

Download article (PDF)

Volume Title
Proceedings of the International Conference on Current Issues in Education (ICCIE 2023)
Series
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research
Publication Date
20 May 2024
ISBN
978-2-38476-245-3
ISSN
2352-5398
DOI
10.2991/978-2-38476-245-3_22How to use a DOI?
Copyright
© 2024 The Author(s)
Open Access
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

Cite this article

TY  - CONF
AU  - Rosidah
AU  - Risky Setiawan
AU  - Zafrullah
AU  - Annisa Fitriani
AU  - Ersa Mayola
PY  - 2024
DA  - 2024/05/20
TI  - Quality Analysis of Physics Questions in Class 10 High School with Iteman 4.0: Case Study
BT  - Proceedings of the International Conference on Current Issues in Education (ICCIE 2023)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 201
EP  - 213
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-245-3_22
DO  - 10.2991/978-2-38476-245-3_22
ID  - 2024
ER  -