<Previous Article In Issue
Volume 6, Issue 4, November 1999, Pages 448 - 488
What a Classical r-Matrix Really Is
Authors
Boris A. Kupershmidt
Corresponding Author
Boris A. Kupershmidt
Received 8 September 1999, Accepted 14 October 1999, Available Online 1 November 1999.
- DOI
- 10.2991/jnmp.1999.6.4.5How to use a DOI?
- Abstract
The notion of classical r-matrix is re-examined, and a definition suitable to differential (-difference) Lie algebras, where the standard definitions are shown to be deficient, is proposed, the notion of an O-operator. This notion has all the natural properties one would expect form it, but lacks those which are artifacts of finite-dimensional isomorpisms such as not true in differential generality relation End (V ) V V for a vector space V . Examples considered include a quadratic Poisson bracket on the dual space to a Lie algebra; generalized symplectic-quadratic models of such brackets (aka Clebsch representations); and Drinfel'd's 2-cocycle interpretation of nondegenate classical r-matrices.
- Copyright
- © 2006, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.
- Open Access
- This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
<Previous Article In Issue
Cite this article
TY - JOUR AU - Boris A. Kupershmidt PY - 1999 DA - 1999/11/01 TI - What a Classical r-Matrix Really Is JO - Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physics SP - 448 EP - 488 VL - 6 IS - 4 SN - 1776-0852 UR - https://doi.org/10.2991/jnmp.1999.6.4.5 DO - 10.2991/jnmp.1999.6.4.5 ID - Kupershmidt1999 ER -