# Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physics

Volume 28, Issue 3, September 2021, Pages 309 - 320

# A Local Equivariant Index Theorem for Sub-Signature Operators

Authors
Kaihua Bao1, Jian Wang2, Yong Wang3, *
1School of Mathematics and Physics, Ineer Mongolia University for Nationalities, TongLiao, 028005, P.R. China
2School of Science, Tianjin University of Technology and Education, Tianjin, 300222, P.R. China
3School of Mathematics and Statistics, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024, P.R. China
*Corresponding author: Email: wangy581@nenu.edu.cn
Corresponding Author
Yong Wang
Received 7 February 2021, Accepted 18 April 2021, Available Online 6 May 2021.
DOI
10.2991/jnmp.k.210427.001How to use a DOI?
Keywords
Sub-signature operator; equivariant index
Abstract

In this paper, we prove a local equivariant index theorem for sub-signature operators which generalizes Weiping Zhang’s index theorem for sub-signature operators.

Open Access

## 1. INTRODUCTION

The Atiyah-Singer index Theorem ([2,3]) gives a cohomological interpretation of the Fredholm index of an elliptic operator. The Atiyah-Bott- Segal-Singer index formula, which called the equivariant index theorem, is a generalization with group action of the Atiyah-Singer index theorem. The first direct proof of this result was given by Patodi, Gilkey, Atiyah-Bott-Patodi partly by using invariant theory [1,12]. This theorem generalizes the Atiyah-Singer index theorem and the Atiyah-Bott fixed point formula for elliptic complexes, which is a generalization of the Lefschetz fixed point formula. In [7], Berline and Vergne gave a heat kernel proof of the Atiyah-Bott-Segal-Singer index formula. Moreover, Lafferty, Yu and Zhang [14] presented a simple and direct geometric proof of the equivariant index theorem for an orientation- preserving isometry on an even dimensional spin manifold by using Clifford asymptotics of heat kernel. Furthermore, Ponge and H. Wang gave a different proof of the equivariant index formula by the Greiner’s approach to the heat kernel asymptotics [19]. In [15], in order to prove family rigidity theorems, Liu and Ma proved the equivariant family index formula. In [22], Y. Wang gave another proof of the local equivarint index theorem for a family of Dirac operators by the Greiner’s approach to the heat kernel asymptotics. In [21], using the Greiner’s approach to the heat kernel asymptotics, Y. Wang proved the equivariant Gauss-Bonnet-Chern formula and gave the variation formulas for the equivariant Ray-Singer metric, which are originally due to J. M. Bismut and W. Zhang [9].

In parallel, Freed [11] considered the case of an orientation reversing involution acting on an odd dimensional spin manifold and gave the associated Lefschetz formulas by the K-theretical way. In [20], Wang constructed an even spectral triple by the Dirac operator and the orientation-reversing involution and computed the Connes-Chern character for this spectral triple. In [16], Liu and Wang proved an equivariant odd index theorem for Dirac operators with involution parity and the Atiyah-Hirzebruch vanishing theorems for odd dimensional spin manifolds. In [24] and [25], Zhang introduced the sub-signature operators and proved a local index formula for these operators. By computing the adiabatic limit of eta-invariants associated to the so-called sub-signature operators, a new proof of the Riemann- Roch-Grothendieck type formula of Bismut-Lott was given in [17] and [10]. The motivation of the present article is to prove a local equivariant index formula for sub-signature operators. As the subsignature operator is locally a twisted Dirac operator, we can obtain our theorem by the proof of equivariant twisted Dirac operators. We give a direct proof of a local equivariant index theorem for subsignature operators by the Volterra calculus, rather than derived from the local equivariant index theorem of twisted Dirac operators. Thus our direct proof of the equivariant index theorem of the subsignature operators using Volterra calculus can be seen as analogous to the works [21,23,26].

This paper is organized as follows: In Section 2, we recall some background on sub-signature operators. In Section 3.1, we prove a local equivariant index formula for sub-signature operators in even dimension. In Section 3.2, we prove a local equivariant odd dimensional index formula for sub-signature operators with an orientation-reversing involution.

## 2. THE SUB-SIGNATURE OPERATORS

In this section, we give the standard setup (also see Section 1 in [24]). Let M be an oriented closed manifold of dimension n. Let E be an oriented sub-bundle of the tangent vector bundle TM. Let gTM be a metric on TM. Let gE be the induced metric on E. Let E be the sub-bundle of TM orthogonal to E with respect to gTM. Let gE be the metric on E induced from gTM. Then (TM, gTM) has the following orthogonal splittings

TM=EE, (2.1)
gTM=gEgE. (2.2)

Clearly, E carries a canonically induced orientation. We identify the quotient bundle TM/E with E⊥.

Let Ω(M)=0nΩi(M)=0nΓ(i(T*M)) be the set of smooth sections of ∧(T*M). Let * be the Hodge star operator of gTM. Then Ω(M) inherits the following inner product

α,β=Mα*β¯,α,βΩ(M). (2.3)

We use gTM to identify TM and T*M. For any e ∈ Γ(TM), let e∧ and ie be the standard notation for exterior and interior multiplications on Ω(M). Let c(e) = e ∧ −ie, c^(e)=e+ie be the Clifford actions on Ω(M) verifying that

c(e)c(e)+c(e)c(e)=-2e,egTM, (2.4)
c^(e)c^(e)+c^(e)c^(e)=2e,egTM, (2.5)
c(e)c^(e)+c^(e)c(e)=0. (2.6)

Denote k = dimE and we assume k is even. Let {f1, ⋯, fk} be an oriented (local) orthonormal basis of E. Set

c^(E,gE)=c^(f1)c^(fk), (2.7)
where c^(E,gE) does not depend on the choice of the orthonormal basis. Let
=Ideven(T*M)-Idodd(T*M)
(T*M)=even(T*M)odd(T*M).

Set

τ(M,gE)=(1-1)k(k+1)2c^(E,gE). (2.8)

It is easy to check

τ(M,gE)2=1. (2.9)

Let

±(T*M,gE)={ω*(T*M),τ(M,gE)ω=±ω}
the (even/odd) eigen-bundles of τ(M, gE) and by Ω±(M, gE) the corresponding set of smooth sections. Let δ = d* be the formal adjoint operator of the exterior differential operator d on Ω(M) with respect to the inner product (2.3). Set on Ω(M) = Γ(ΛT*M)
DE=12(c^(E,gE)(d+δ)+(-1)k(d+δ)c^(E,gE)). (2.10)

Then we can check

DEτ(M,gE)=-τ(M,gE)DE, (2.11)
D E*=(-1)k(k+1)2DE, (2.12)
where D E* is the formal adjoint operator of DE with respect to the inner product (2.3). Set
D˜E=(-1)k(k+1)2DE.

From (2.11), D˜E is a formal self-adjoint first order elliptic differential operator on Ω(M) interchanging Ω±(M, gE).

### Definition 2.1.

The sub-signature operator D˜E,+ with respect to (E, gTM) is the restriction of D˜E on Ω+(M, gE).

If we denote the restriction of D˜E on Ω±(M, gE) by D˜E,±, then

D˜ E,±*=D˜E,.

Recall that E is the subbundle of TM and that we have the orthogonal decomposition (2.1) of TM and the metric gTM. Let PE (resp. PE) be the orthogonal projection from TM to E(resp. E). Let ∇TM be the Levi-Civita connection of gTM. We will use the same notation for its lift to Ω(M). Set

E=PETMPE, (2.13)
E=PETMPE. (2.14)

Then ∇E(resp. ∇E) is a Euclidean connection on E(resp.E), and we will use the same notation for its lifting on Ω(E*)(resp. Ω(E⊥,*)). Let S be the tensor defined by

TM=E+E+S.

Then S takes values in skew-adjoint endomorphisms of TM, and interchanges E and E. Let {e1, ⋯, en} be an oriented (local) orthonormal base of TM. To specify the role of E, set {f1, ⋯, fk} be an oriented (local) orthonormal basis of E. We will use the greek subscripts for the basis of E. Then by Proposition 1.4 in [24], we have

### Proposition 2.2.

The following identity holds,

D˜E=(-1)k(k+1)2(c^(E,gE)(d+δ)+12ic(ei)( eiTMc^(E,gE))). (2.15)

Similar to Lemma 1.1 in [24], we have

### Lemma 2.3.

For any X ∈ Γ(TM), the following identity holds,

XTMc^(E,gE)=-c^(E,gE)αc^(S(X)fα)c^(fα). (2.16)

Let ΔTM, ΔE be the Bochner Laplacians

ΔTM=in( eiTM,2- eiTMeiTM), (2.17)
ΔE=ik( eiE,2- eiEeiE). (2.18)

Let K be the scalar curvature of (M, gTM). Let RTM (resp., RE, RE) be the curvature of ∇TM (resp., ∇E, ∇E). Let {h1, ⋯, hnk} be an oriented (local) orthonormal base of E. Now we can state the following Lichnerowicz type formula for D˜ E2. From Theorem 1.1 in [24], we have

### Theorem 2.4.

[24] The following identity holds,

D˜ E2=-ΔTM+K4+181i,jn1α,βkRE(ei,ej)fβ,fαc(ei)c(ej)c^(fα)c^(fβ)+181i,jn1s,tn-kRE(ei,ej)ht,hsc(ei)c(ej)c^(hs)c^(ht)+12αc^((ΔTM-ΔE)fα)c^(fα)+i,α(c^(S(ei)fα)c^(fα) eiTM-c^(S(ei) eiEfα)c^(fα)+12c^( ( eiTM- eiE)eiEfα)c^(fα)+34S(ei)fα)2)+14i,αβc^(S(ei)fα)c^(S(ei)fβ)c^(fα)c^(fβ). (2.19)

## 3.1. A Local Even Dimensional Equivariant Index Theorem for Sub-Signature Operators

Let M be a closed oriented Riemannian manifold of even dimension n and ϕ an orientation-preserving isometry on M. Then the smooth map ϕ induces a map ϕ˜=ϕ-1,*:T x*MT ϕ(x)*M on the exterior algebra bundle T x*M. Let D˜E be the sub-signature operator. We assume that dϕ preserves E and E and their orientations, then ϕ˜c^(E,gE)=c^(E,gE)ϕ˜. Then ϕ˜D˜E=D˜Eϕ˜. We will compute the equivariant index

Indϕ(D˜ E+)=Tr(ϕ˜|kerD˜ E+)-Tr(ϕ˜|kerD˜ E-). (3.1)

We recall the Greiner’s approach to the heat kernel asymptotics as in [19] and [4,5,13]. Define the operator given by

(Q0u)(x,s)=0e-sD˜ E2[u(x,t-s)]dt,uΓc(M×𝕉,T*M), (3.2)
maps u continuously to D′(M × ℝ, ∧T*M)) which is the dual space of Γc(M × ℝ, ∧T*M)). We have
(D˜ E2+t)Q0u=Q0(D˜ E2+t)u=u,uΓc(M×𝕉,T*M)). (3.3)

Let (D˜ E2+t)-1 be the Volterra inverse of D˜ E2+t as in [5]. That is

(D˜E,±+t)-1(D˜E,±+t)=I-R1,(D˜E,±+t)(D˜E,±+t)-1=I-R2, (3.4)
where R1, R2 are smoothing operators. Let
(Q0u)(x,t)=M×𝕉KQ0(x,y,t-s)u(y,s)dyds, (3.5)
and kt(x, y) is the heat kernel of e-tD˜ E2. We get
KQ0(x,y,t)=kt(x,y)whent>0,whent<0,KQ0(x,y,t)=0. (3.6)

Then Q0 has the Volterra property, i.e., it has a distribution kernel of the form KQ0(x, y, ts) where KQ0(x, y, t) vanishes on the region t < 0. The parabolic homogeneity of the heat operator D˜ E2+t, i.e. the homogeneity with respect to the dilations of ℝn × ℝ1 given by

λ(ξ,τ)=(λξ,λ2τ),(ξ,τ)𝕉n×𝕉1,λ0. (3.7)

Let p2(x, ξ) + p1(x, ξ) + p0(x, ξ) be the symbol of D˜ E2, then the symbol of D˜ E2+t is -1τ+p2(x,ξ)+p1(x,ξ)+p0(x,ξ), it is homogeneous with respect to (ξ, τ).

In the following, for gS(ℝn+1) and λ ≠ 0, we let gλ be the tempered distribution defined by

gλ(ξ,τ),u(ξ,τ) =|λ|-(n+2) g(ξ,τ),u(λ-1ξ,λ-2τ) ,uS(𝕉n+1). (3.8)

### Definition 3.1.

A distribution gS(ℝn+1) is parabolic homogeneous of degree m, mZ, if for any λ ≠ 0, we have gλ = λmg.

Let ℂ denote the complex halfplane {Imτ < 0} with closure 𝔺-¯. Then:

### Lemma 3.2.

[5] Let q(ξ, τ) ∈ C((ℝn × ℝ)/0) be a parabolic homogeneous symbol of degree m such that:

1. (i)

q extends to a continuous function on (𝕉n×𝔺-¯)\0 in such way to be holomorphic in the last variable when the latter is restricted to. Then there is a unique gS(ℝn+1) agreeing with q onn+1\0 so that:

2. (ii)

g is homogeneous of degree m;

3. (iii)

The inverse Fourier transform g(x,t) vanishes for t < 0.

Let U be an open subset of ℝn. We define Volterra symbols and Volterra ΨDOs on U × ℝn+1\0 as follows.

### Definition 3.3.

S Vm(U×𝕉n+1),m𝕑, consists in smooth functions q(x, ξ, τ) on U × ℝn × ℝ with an asymptotic expansion qj0qm-j, where:

1. (i)

qlC(U × [(ℝn × ℝ)/0] is a homogeneous Volterra symbol of degree l, i.e. ql is parabolic homogeneous of degree l and satisfies the property (i) in Lemma 2.3 with respect to the last n + 1 variables;

2. (ii)

The sign ~ means that, for any integer N and any compact K, U, there is a constant CNKαβk > 0 such that for xK and for |ξ|+|τ|12>1 we have

| xα ξβ τk(q-j<Nqm-j)(x,ξ,τ)|CNKαβk(|ξ|+|τ|12)m-N-|β|-2k. (3.9)

### Definition 3.4.

Ψ Vm(U×𝕉),m𝕑, consists in continuous operators Q0 from C c(Ux×𝕉t) to C(Ux × ℝt) such that:

1. (i)

Q0 has the Volterra property;

2. (ii)

Q0 = q(x, Dx, Dt) + R for some symbol q in S Vm(U×𝕉) and some smoothing operator R.

In what follows, if Q0 is a Volterra ΨDO, we let KQ0 (x, y, ts) denote its distribution kernel, so that the distribution KQ0 (x, y, t) vanishes for t < 0.

### Definition 3.5.

Let qm(x, ξ, τ) ∈ C(U × (ℝn+1/0)) be a homogeneous Volterra symbol of order m and let gmC(U) ⊗ 𝕊′(ℝn+1) denote its unique homogeneous extension given by Lemma 2.3. Then:

1. (i)

qm(x,y,t) is the inverse Fourier transform of gm(x, ξ, τ) in the last n + 1 variables;

2. (ii)

qm(x, Dx, Dt) is the operator with kernel qm(x,y-x,t).

### Proposition 3.6.

([5,13]) The following properties hold.

1. 1)

Composition. Let QjΨ Vmj(U×𝕉),j=1,2 have symbol qj and suppose that Q1 or Q2 is properly supported. Then Q1Q2 is a Volterra ΨDO of order m1 + m2 with symbol q1q2 1α! ξαq1D xαq2.

2. 2)

Parametrices. An operator Q is the order m Volterra ΨDO with the paramatrix P then

QP=1-R1,PQ=1-R2 (3.10)

where R1, R2 are smoothing operators.

### Proposition 3.7.

([5,13]) The differential operator D˜ E2+t is invertible and its inverse (D˜ E2+t)-1 is a Volterra ΨDO of order −2.

We denote by Mϕ the fixed-point set of ϕ, and for a = 0, ⋯, n, we let Mϕ=0anM aϕ, where M aϕ is an a-dimensional submanifold. Given a fixed-point x0 in a component M aϕ, consider some local coordinates x = (x1, ⋯, xa) around x0. Setting b = na, we may further assume that over the range of the domain of the local coordinates there is an orthonormal frame e1(x), ⋯, eb(x) of N zϕ. This defines fiber coordinates v = (v1, ⋯, vb). Composing with the map (x, v) ∈ Nϕ (ε0) expx(v) we then get local coordinates x1, ⋯, xa, v1, ⋯, vb for M near the fixed point x0. We shall refer to this type of coordinates as tubular coordinates. Then Nϕ(ε0) is homeomorphic with a tubular neighborhood of Mϕ. Set iMϕ: MϕM be an inclusion map. Since dϕ preserves E and E⊥, considering the oriented (local) orthonormal basis {f1, ⋯, fk, h1, ⋯, hnk}, set

dϕx0=(exp(L1)00exp(L2)), (3.11)
where L1 ∈ 𝔰o(k) and L2 ∈ 𝔰o(nk)

Let

A^(RMϕ)=det12(RMϕ/4πsinh(RMϕ/4π));νϕ(RNϕ)det-12(1-ϕNe-RNϕ2π). (3.12)

The aim of this section is to prove the following result.

### Theorem 3.8.

(Local Equivariant Sub-Signature Index Theorem. Even Dimension)

Let x0Mϕ, then

limt0Str[ ϕ˜(x0)Kt(x0,ϕ(x0)) ]=(1-1)k22n2{A^(RMϕ)νϕ(RNϕ)i Mϕ*[det12(cosh(RE4π-L12))×det12(sinh(RE4π-L22)RE4π-L22)Pf(RE4π-L22)]}(a,0)(x0), (3.13)
where L1so(k), L2so(nk) and Pf(RE4π-L22) denotes the Pfaffian of (RE4π-L22).

Next we give a detailed proof of Theorem 3.9. Let Q=(D˜ E2+t)-1. For xMϕ and t > 0 set

IQ(x,t)ϕ˜(x)-1N xϕ(ɛ)ϕ(expxv)KQ(expxv,expx(ϕ(x)v),t)dv. (3.14)

Here we use a trivialization over ∧ (T*M) about the tubular coordinates. Using the tubular coordinates, we have

IQ(x,t)=|v|<ɛϕ˜(x,0)-1ϕ˜(x,v)KQ(x,v;x,ϕ(x)v;t)dv. (3.15)

Let

q m-j(T*M)(x,v;ξ,ν;τ)ϕ˜(x,0)-1ϕ˜(x,v)qm-j(x,v;ξ,ν;τ). (3.16)

We mention the following result

### Proposition 3.9.

[19] Let QΨ Vm(M×𝕉,(T*M)),m𝕑. Uniformly on each component M aϕ

IQ(x,t)j0t-(a2+[m2]+1)I Qj(x)ast0+, (3.17)
where I Qj(x) is defined by
I Q(j)(x)|α|m-[m2]+2jvαα!( vαq 2[m2]-2j+|α|(T*M))(x,0;0,(1-ϕ(x))v;1)dv. (3.18)

Similar to Theorem 1.2 in [15] and Section 2 (d) in [8], we have

Strτ[ϕ˜exp(-tD˜ E2)]=(-1)k2MStr[c^(E,gE)kt(x,ϕ(x))]dx=(-1)k2MStr[c^(E,gE)K(D˜ E2+t)-1(x,ϕ(x),t)]dx. (3.19)

We will compute the local index in this trivialization. Let (V, q) be a finite dimensional real vector space equipped with a quadratic form. Let C(V, q) be the associated Clifford algebra, i.e., the associative algebra generated by V with the relations v · w + w · v = −2q(v, w) for v, wV. Let {e1, ⋯, en} be an orthomormal basis of (V, q), let C(V,q)^C(V,-q) be the grading tensor product of C(V, q) and C(V, −q), and *V^*V be the grading tensor product of ∧*V and ∧*V. Define the symbol map:

σ:C(V,q)^C(V,-q)*V^*V; (3.20)
where σ(c(ej1) ⋯ c(ejl) ⊗ 1) = ej1 ∧⋯ ∧ ej1 ⊗ 1, σ(1c^(ej1)c^(ejl))=1e^j1e^j1. Using the interior multiplication ι(ej): ∧V →∧∗−1V and the exterior multiplication ε(ej): ∧V → ∧∗+1V, we define representations of C(V, q) and C(V, −q) on the exterior algebra:
c:C(V,q)EndV,ejc(ej):ɛ(ej)-ι(ej); (3.21)
c^:C(V,-q)EndV,ejc^(ej):ɛ(ej)+ι(ej). (3.22)

The tensor product of these representations yields an isomorphism of superalgebras

cc^:C(V,q)^C(V,-q)EndV (3.23)
which we will also denote by c. We obtain a supertrace (i.e., a linear functional vanishing on supercommutators) on C(V,q)^C(V,-q) by setting Str(a) = StrEndV[c(a)] for aC(V,q)^(V,-q), where StrEndV is the canonical supertrace on End V.

### Lemma 3.10.

For 1 ≤ i1 < ⋯ < ipn, 1 ≤ j1 < ⋯ < jqn, when p = q = n,

Str[c(ei1)c(ein)c^(ei1)c^(ein)]=(-1)n(n+1)22n (3.24)
and otherwise equals zero.

We will also denote the volume element in V^V by ω=e1ene^1e^n. For aV^V, let Ta be the coefficient of ω. The linear functional T:V^VR is called the Berezin trace. Then for a aC(V,q)^(V,.q), we have Strs(a)=(-1)n(n+1)22n(Tσ)(a). We define the Getzler order as follows:

degj=12degt=-degxj=1,degc(ej)=1,degc^(ej)=0. (3.25)

Let QΨ V*(𝕉n×𝕉,*T*M) have symbol

q(x,ξ,τ)kmqk(x,ξ,τ), (3.26)
where qk(x, ξ, τ) is an order k symbol. Then taking components in each subspace ∧jT*M ⊗ ∧lT*M of ∧T*M ⊗ ∧T*M and using Taylor expansions at x = 0 give formal expansions
σ[q(x,ξ,τ)]j,kσ[qk(x,ξ,τ)](j,l)j,k,αxαα!σ[ xαqk(0,ξ,τ)](j,l). (3.27)

The symbol xαα!σ[ xαqk(0,ξ,τ)](j,l) is the Getzler homogeneous of k + j − |α|. Therefore, we can expand σ [q(x, ξ, τ)] as

σ[q(x,ξ,τ)]j0q(m-j)(x,ξ,τ),q(m)0, (3.28)
where q(mj) is a Getzler homogeneous symbol of degree mj.

### Definition 3.11.

The integer m is called as the Getzler order of Q. The symbol q(m) is the principal Getzler homogeneous symbol of Q. The operator Q(m) = q(m)(x, Dx, Dt) is called the model operator of Q.

Let e1,..., en be an oriented orthonormal basis of Tx0M such that e1, ⋯, ea span Tx0Mϕ and ea+1, ⋯, en span N x0ϕ. This provides us with normal coordinates (x1, ⋯, xn) → expx0 (x1e1 +⋯+xnen). Moreover using parallel translation enables us to construct a synchronous local oriented tangent frame e1(x), ..., en(x) such that e1(x), ⋯, ea(x) form an oriented frame of TM aϕ and ea+1(x), ⋯, en(x) form an (oriented) frame Nτ (when both frames are restricted to Mϕ). This gives rise to trivializations of the tangent and exterior algebra bundles. Write

ϕ(0)=(100ϕN)=exp(Aij), (3.29)
where Aij ∈ 𝔰o(n).

Let ∧(n) = ∧n be the exterior algebra of ℝn. We shall use the following gradings on (n)^(n),

(n)^(n)=1k1,k2a1l¯1,l¯2bk1,l¯1(n)^k2,l¯2(n), (3.30)
where k,l¯(n) is the space of forms dxi1dxik+l¯ with 1 ≤ i1 < ⋯ < ika and a+1ik+1<<ik+l¯n. Given a form ω(n)^(n), denote by ω(k1,l¯1),(k2,l¯2) its component in (n)(k1,l¯1)^(k2,l¯2)(n). We denote by |ω|(a,0),(a,0) the Berezin integral |ω(*,0),(*,0)|(a,0),(a,0) of its component ω(*,0),(*,0) in ∧(*,0),(*,0)(n).

Let ACl(V,q)^Cl(V,-q), then

Str[ϕ˜A]=(-1)n22n(-14)b2det(1-ϕN)|σ(A)|((a,0),(a,0))+(-1)n22n0l1<b,0l2b|σ(ϕ˜)((0,l1),(0,l2))σ(A)((a,b-l1),(a,b-l2))|(n,n). (3.31)

In order to calculate Str[ϕ˜A], we need to consider the representation of |σ(ϕ˜)((0,b),(0,l2))σ(A)((a,0),(a,b-l2))|(n,n). Let the matrix ϕN equal

ϕN=(Aa2+100An2),Aa2+1=(cosθa2+1sinθa2+1-sinθa2+1cosθa2+1),An2=(cosθn2sinθn2-sinθn2cosθn2). (3.32)

From Lemma 3.2 in [26], then

### Lemma 3.12.

We have

ϕ˜=(12)n-a2j=a2+1n[(1+cosθj)-(1-cosθj)c(e2j-1)c(e2j)c^(e2j-1)c^(e2j)+sinθj(c(e2j-1)c(e2j)-c^(e2j-1)c^(e2j))]. (3.33)

Then we obtain

σ(ϕ˜)((0,b),(0,l2))=(12)n-a2σ{j=a2+1n[-(1-cosθj)c(e2j-1)c(e2j)c^(e2j-1)c^(e2j)+sinθj(c(e2j-1)c(e2j))]}((0,b),(0,l2))=(12)n-a2ea+1enσ{j=a2+1n[-(1-cosθj)c^(e2j-1)c^(e2j)+sinθj]}(0,l2)=(12)n-a2ea+1enσ{j=a2+1n2sinθj2[cosθj2-sinθj2c^(e2j-1)c^(e2j)]}(0,l2)=(12)n-a2ea+1endet12(1-ϕN)σ[exp(-141i,jnAijc^(ei)c^(ej))](0,l2)=(12)n-a2ea+1endet12(1-ϕN)σ[exp(-141i,jk(L1)ijc^(fi)c^(fj)-141i,jn-k(L2)k+i,k+jc^(hi)c^(hj))](0,l2). (3.34)

Next we calculate |σ (A)|((a,0),(a,bl2)). In the following, we shall use the following “curvature forms”: R′ ≔ (Ri,j)1≤i,ja, R″ ≔ (Ra+i,a+j)1≤i,jb. Let

R˙=141α,βkREfα,fβc^(fα)c^(fβ),R¨=141s,tn-kREhs,htc^(hs)c^(ht);
and
R˙˜=141α,βk(RE-L1)fα,fβc^(fα)c^(fβ),R¨˜=141s,tn-k(RE-L2)hs,htc^(hs)c^(ht).

By (2.19), let F=D˜ E2, we get

### Proposition 3.13.

The model operator of F is

F(2)=-r=1n(r+181i,j,lnRTM(ei,ej)el,eryleiej)2+181i,jn1α,βkRE(ei,ej)fβ,fαeiejc^(fα)c^(fβ)+181i,jn1s,tn-kRE(ei,ej)ht,hseiejc^(hs)c^(ht). (3.35)

From the representation of F(2), we get the model operator of t+D˜ E2 is t+F(2). And we have

(t+F(2))KQ(-2)(x,y,t)=0. (3.36)

Similar to Lemma 2.9 in [19], we get

### Lemma 3.14.

Let Q ∈ Ψ(−2)(ℝn × ℝ, ∧(T*M)) be a parametrix for (F(2) + t)−1. Then

1. (1)

Q has Getzler order -2 and its model operator is (F(2) + t)−1.

2. (2)

For all t > 0,

(-1)k2c^(E,gE)I(F(2)+t)-1(0,t)=(-1)k2c^(E,gE)(4πt)-a2det12(1-ϕN)det12(tR2sinh(tR2))det-12(1-ϕNe-tR)exp(t(R˙˜+R¨˜)). (3.37)

Similar to Lemma 3.6 in [22]. we have

### Lemma 3.15.

QΨ V*(𝕉n×𝕉,(T*M))has the Getzler order m and model operator Q(m). Then as t → 0+

1. (1)

σ[IQ(0,t)](j,l)=O(tj-m-a-12), if mj is odd.

2. (2)

σ[IQ(0,t)](j,l)=O(tj-m-a-22)IQ(m)(0,1)(j,l)+O(tj-m-a2), if mj is even.

In particular, for m = −2 and j = a and a is even we get

σ[IQ(0,t)]((a,0),(a,b-l2))=IQ(-2)(0,1)((a,0),(a,b-l2))+O(t12). (3.38)

With all these preparations, we are going to prove the local even dimensional equivariant index theorem for sub-signature operators. Substituting (3.34), (3.37) into (3.31), we obtain

limt0Strɛ[ ϕ˜(x0)(-1)k2c^(E,gE)I(F+t)-1(x0,t) ]=(-1)n22n(12)n-a2(4π)-a2(-1)k2|A^(RMϕ)νϕ(RNϕ)σ[c^(f1)c^(fk)exp(R˙˜+R¨˜)]|((a,0),n)=(1-1)k22n2{A^(RMϕ)νϕ(RNϕ)i Mϕ*[det12(cosh(RE4π-L12))×det12(sinh(RE4π-L22)RE4π-L22)Pf(RE4π-L22)]}(a,0)(x0). (3.39)

Where we have used the algebraic result of Proposition 3.13 in [6], and the Berezin integral in the right hand side of (3.39) is the application of the following lemma.

### Lemma 3.16.

Let L1so(k), L2so(nk), we have

|σ[c^(f1)c^(fk)exp(R˙˜+R¨˜)]|(n)=(-1)n-k2det12(cosh(RE-L12))×det12(sinh(RE-L22)(RE-L2)/2)Pf(RE-L22). (3.40)

Proof. In order to compute this differential form, we make use of the Chern root algorithm (see [22]). Assume that n = dimM and k = dimE are both even integers. As in [7], let L1so(k), L2so(nk), we write

RE-L1=((0-θ1θ10)00(0-θ-k2θ-k20)),RE-L2=((0-θ^1θ^10)00(0-θ^n-k2θ^n-k20)). (3.41)

Then we obtain

141α,βk(RE-L1)fα,fβc^(fα)c^(fβ)=121α<βk(RE-L1)fα,fβc^(fα)c^(fβ)=121jk2θjc^(f2j-1)c^(f2j); (3.42)
141s,tn-k(RE-L2)hs,htc^(hs)c^(ht)=121s<tn-k(RE-L2)hs,htc^(hs)c^(ht)=121ln-k2θ^lc^(h2l-1)c^(h2l). (3.43)

Then the left hand side of (3.40) is

|σ(c^(f1)c^(fk)exp(R˙˜+R¨˜))|(n)=|σ(c^(f1)c^(fk)1jk2exp(12θjc^(f2j-1)c^(f2j))1ln-k2exp(12θ^lc^(h2l-1)c^(h2l)))|(n)=|σ(c^(f1)c^(fk)1jk2[cosθj2-sinθj2c^(f2j-1)c^(f2j)]1ln-k2[cosθ^l2-sinθ^l2c^(h2l-1)c^(h2l)])|(n)=(-1)n-k21jk2cosθj21ln-k2sinθ^l2. (3.44)

Now we consider the right hand side of (3.40),

(RE-L1)2p=(-1)p((θ 12p00θ 12p)00(θ k22p00θ k22p)). (3.45)

Then

det12(cosh(RE-L12))=j=1k2(p=0(θj2)2p(-1)p(2p)!)=j=1k2cosh-1θj2=j=1k2e-1θj2+e--1θj22=j=1k2cosθj2. (3.46)

Similarly, we have

det12(sinh(RE-L22)(RE-L2)/2)=j=1n-k2sinθ^j2θ^j2. (3.47)

On the other hand,

Pf(RE-L22)=T(exp(s<tRE-L22hs,hthsht))=T(exp(1jn-k2θ^j2h2j-1h2j))=j=1n-k2θ^j2. (3.48)

Combining these equations, the proof of lemma 3.17 is complete.

To summarize, we have proved Theorem 3.9.

## 3.2. The Local Odd Dimensional Equivariant Index Theorem for Sub-Signature Operators

In this section, we give a proof of a local odd dimensional equivariant index theorem for sub-signature operators. Let M be an odd dimensional oriented closed Riemannian manifold. Using (2.19) in Section 2, we may define the sub-signature operators D˜E. Let γ be an orientation reversing involution isometric acting on M. Let dγ preserve E, E and preserve the orientation of E, then γ˜τ^(E,gE)=τ^(E,gE)γ˜, where γ˜ is the lift on the exterior algebra bundle ∧TM of dγ. There exists a self-adjoint lift γ˜:Γ(M;(T*M))Γ(M;( T*M)) of dγ satisfying

γ˜2=1;D˜Eγ˜=-γ˜D˜E. (3.49)

Now the +1 and −1 eigenspaces of γ˜ give a splitting

Γ(M;(T*M))Γ+(M;(T*M))Γ-(M;(T*M))) (3.50)
then the sub-signature operator interchanges Γ+(M; ∧(T*M)) and Γ(M; ∧(T*M)), and c^(E,gE) preserves Γ +(M; ∧(T*M)) and Γ(M; ∧(T*M)).

Denotes by D˜ E+ the restriction of D˜E to Γ+(M, ∧(TM)). We assume dimE = k is even, then (D˜E)c^(E,gE)=c^(E,gE)(D˜E) and c^(E,gE) is a linear map from kerD˜ E± to kerD˜ E±.

The purpose of this section is to compute

indc^(E,gE)[(D˜ E+)]=Tr(c^(E,gE)|kerD˜ E+)-Tr(c^(E,gE)|kerD˜ E+). (3.51)

By the Mckean-Singer formula, we have

indc^(E,gE)(D˜ E+)=M(-1)k2Tr[γ˜c^(E,gE)kt(x,γ(x))]dx=M(-1)k2Tr[γ˜c^(E,gE)K(F+t)-1(x,γ(x),t)]dx. (3.52)

Let

RE-L1=((0-θ1θ10)00(0-θ-k2θ-k20)),RE-L2=((0-θ^1θ^10)00(0-θ^n-k-12θ^n-k-120)0); (3.53)
and
Pf(RE-L22)=j=1n-k-12θ^j2. (3.54)

Similar to Theorem 3.9, we get the main Theorem in this section.

### Theorem 3.17.

(Local odd dimensional equivariant index Theorem for sub-signature operators)

Let x0Mγ, then

limt0Tr[ γ˜(x0)c^(E,gE)I(F+t)-1(x0,t) ]=-(1-1)k2-12n2{A^(RMγ)νϕ(RNγ)i Mγ*[det12(cosh(RE4π-L12))×det12(sinh(RE4π-L22)RE4π-L22)Pf(RE4π-L22)]}(a,0)(x0). (3.55)

## CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

## AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION

KB and YW contributed in study conceptualization and writing (review and editing) the manuscript. JW and YW contributed in data curation, formal analysis and writing (original draft). YW contributed in funding acquisition and project administration, supervised the project, formal analysis and writing (original draft) the manuscript.

## FUNDING

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China: No. 11771070. NSFC. 11901322

## ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The work of the first author was supported by NSFC. 11901322. The work of the third author was supported by NSFC. 11771070. The authors also thank the referees for their careful reading and helpful comments.

## Footnotes

Data availability statement: The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

## REFERENCES

[2]MF Atiyah and IM Singer, The index of elliptic operators: I, Ann. of Math., Vol. 87, 1968, pp. 484-530.
[3]MF Atiyah and IM Singer, The index of elliptic operators: III, Ann. of Math., Vol. 87, 1968, pp. 546-604.
[4]R Beals and PC Greiner, Calculus on Heisenberg manifolds, Ann. Math. Studies, (AM-119), Vol. 119, 1988, pp. 194.
[6]N Berline, E Getzler, and M Vergne, Heat kernels and Dirac operators, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992.
[11]D Freed, Two index theorems in odd dimensions, Commu. Anal. Geom., Vol. 6, 1998, pp. 317-329.
[12]PB Gilkey, Invariance theory, the heat equation, and the Atiyah-Singer index theorem, Publish or Perish, 1984.
[13]P Greiner, An asymptotic expansion for the heat equation, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., Vol. 41, 1971, pp. 163-218.
[15]K Liu and X Ma, On family rigidity theorems, I. Duke Math. J., Vol. 102, 2000, pp. 451-474.
[16]K Liu and Y Wang, Rigidity theorems on odd dimensional manifolds, Pure and Appl. Math. Quarterly, Vol. 5, 2009, pp. 1139-1159.
[20]Y Wang, Chern-Connes character for the invariant Dirac operator in odd dimensions, Sci. China Ser. A, Vol. 48, 2005, pp. 1124-1134.
[21]Y Wang, The Greiner’s approach of heat kernel asymptotics and the variation formulas for the equivariant Ray-Singer metric, Int. J. Geom Methods Mod. Phy., Vol. 12, 2015, pp. 1550066.
[25]W Zhang, Sub-signature operator and its local index theorem, Chin. Sci. Bull., Vol. 41, 1996, pp. 294-295.
[26]JW Zhou, A geometric proof of the Lefschetz fixed-point theorem for signature operators (Chinese), Acta Math. Sinica., Vol. 35, 1992, pp. 230-23.
Journal
Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physics
Volume-Issue
28 - 3
Pages
309 - 320
Publication Date
2021/05/06
ISSN (Online)
1776-0852
ISSN (Print)
1402-9251
DOI
10.2991/jnmp.k.210427.001How to use a DOI?
Open Access

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kaihua Bao
AU  - Jian Wang
AU  - Yong Wang
PY  - 2021
DA  - 2021/05/06
TI  - A Local Equivariant Index Theorem for Sub-Signature Operators
JO  - Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physics
SP  - 309
EP  - 320
VL  - 28
IS  - 3
SN  - 1776-0852
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/jnmp.k.210427.001
DO  - 10.2991/jnmp.k.210427.001
ID  - Bao2021
ER  -