Comparative Analysis Between Constructivism Methods and Modelling Methods on Skills Write Student Poetry
- DOI
- 10.2991/assehr.k.211129.007How to use a DOI?
- Keywords
- writing poetry; constructivism; modelling method
- Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine and analyze comparatively the use of constructivism methods with modelling methods on students’ poetry writing skills. This research is quantitative research using experimental method through treatment by level 2 x 2 design. The sample of this research was taken through the cluster random sampling technique. Data collection techniques used, among others: interviews, observation, documentation, and tests. The data analysis technique used in this study is the technique of analysis of variance and two paths (ANOVA) at a significance level of a=0.05 and then analyzed using the Tukey test. The results showed that: there was a significant difference based on the results of the study there was a significant difference between the use of constructivism learning methods and modelling methods on students’ poetry writing skills with the average score in the experimental group reaching 81.57 while in the control class it reached 78.14. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that students who were given the constructivism method were more creative than students who were taught through the use of modelling methods.
- Copyright
- © 2021 The Authors. Published by Atlantis Press SARL.
- Open Access
- This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.
Cite this article
TY - CONF AU - Efrianto AU - Endry Boeriswati AU - Ninuk Lustyantie AU - Afnita AU - Ridha Hasnul Ulya PY - 2021 DA - 2021/11/30 TI - Comparative Analysis Between Constructivism Methods and Modelling Methods on Skills Write Student Poetry BT - Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Languages and Arts (ICLA 2021) PB - Atlantis Press SP - 33 EP - 41 SN - 2352-5398 UR - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211129.007 DO - 10.2991/assehr.k.211129.007 ID - 2021 ER -