Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Education, Language, Art and Inter-cultural Communication (ICELAIC 2019)

Garden of Disorder: Rethinking the Effectiveness of Aesthetic Experiences

Authors
Qing Yong
Corresponding Author
Qing Yong
Available Online 14 February 2020.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.191217.223How to use a DOI?
Keywords
aesthetic experience, artistic autonomy, aesthetic game
Abstract
Aesthetics is an autonomous garden, which has become a trustworthy force in opening a new world for mankind due to its non-utilitarian nature. However, aesthetic autonomy is not the same as artistic autonomy. By distinguishing the similarities and differences between aesthetic games and aesthetics, as well as aesthetic autonomy and artistic autonomy, this paper concludes that people still need to return to Schiller’s “game” to find the essence of aesthetic experience. In what Jacques Rancière calls “sense of difference,” the aesthetic experience is still valid.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Download article (PDF)

Cite this article

TY  - CONF
AU  - Qing Yong
PY  - 2020
DA  - 2020/02/14
TI  - Garden of Disorder: Rethinking the Effectiveness of Aesthetic Experiences
BT  - 6th International Conference on Education, Language, Art and Inter-cultural Communication (ICELAIC 2019)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 718
EP  - 721
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.191217.223
DO  - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.191217.223
ID  - Yong2020
ER  -