Orbits and Lagrangian Symmetries on the Phase Space
- DOI
- 10.2991/jnmp.k.201203.001How to use a DOI?
- Keywords
- Lagrangian system; symmetry; conservation law
- Abstract
In this article, given a regular Lagrangian system L on the phase space TM of the configuration manifold M and a 1-parameter group G of transformations of M whose lifting to TM preserve the canonical symplectic dynamics associated to L, we determine conditions so that its infinitesimal generator produces conservation laws, in terms of the orbits of G in TM.
- Copyright
- © 2020 The Author. Published by Atlantis Press B.V.
- Open Access
- This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
1. INTRODUCTION
Variational geometry is a central theme in mathematics and in mathematical physics. In its development, it uses methods of the calculus of variations, differential geometry and global analysis and is based on different geometric structures: tangent spaces, fibered manifolds, etc. See for example the great work [13] for an intrinsic characterization of variational problems (variation formulas, symmetries and conserved quantities, Dirac theory of constraints, etc.) on fibered manifolds.
In the time independent case, Lagrangian theory, is a theory on the tangent bundle of the configuration space. Therefore, it is the geometry itself of the tangent bundle that offers its richness in the construction of a Lagrangian system. Thus, it is a well known fact that to every Lagrangian system on the phase space
When the function L defines a regular Lagrangian system, the metric wL is irreducible, establishing in this way the base for a dynamical theory. We believe that this splendid construction of autonomous Variational Calculus starts with J. Klein [11, 12] and Grifone [9], providing a fundamental structure capable to place the theory in a unifying position in many local and global concepts of the Calculus of Variations (physical quantities, Noether invariants, infinitesimal symmetries, dynamical variables, etc.); it even allows to see its reflection in the multiphase construction of the Classical Field Theories (see, by example, [10]).
It is a remarkable fact that in this framework, the group of Noether symmetries of the Lagrangian system L, beyond being a group of point transformations it claims a deep geometrical meaning in terms of symplectic symmetries of the Hamiltonian dynamical system
It is not an easy task to find new invariants on the critical locus of a Variational problem. For Lagrangian systems some significant advances are Prince [15] Crampin [4], Marmo and Mukunda [14], de León and Martín [5]. Here, roughly speaking, we prove that for a 1-parameter group G of transformations of M whose action in (TM, wL) is symplectic, the corresponding infinitesimal generator produce first integrals of the motion for the ζL-dynamics whenever the Legendre function of the system is constant on the orbits of G.
2. SYMPLECTIC DYNAMICS OF LAGRANGIAN SYSTEMS
Let M be an n -dimensional differentiable manifold and TM its tangent bundle. Let us denote by πM: TM → M the canonical projection. Given a coordinate neighborhood U ⊂ M with local coordinates (xi), let us denote with TU the corresponding neighborhood in TM coordinated by (xi, vj). Given x ∈ M, and y ∈ TxM, a vector v ∈ Ty(TN) such that
On the other hand, if ϕt is a local 1-parameter group of transformations of M with the vector field X as its generator, then it has a natural lift as a local 1-parameter group Tϕt of transformations of TM whose generator is called the complete lift of X to TN and is denoted by Xc. In local coordinates, if X = Xi∂/∂xi then
Let us consider the canonical almost tangent structure J on TM locally defined by the (1, 1) tensor field
We define the Liouville vector field C on TM as the one given in local coordinates by the expression
Let us consider a regular Lagrangian function
In this way, we define the symplectic dynamics associated to the Lagrangian system L as the determined by the Hamilton equation
It is useful to consider the expression in local coordinates of the Legendre 1-form θL,
The key fact is that the Hamiltonian vector field in (1) has the local coordinate expression
Finally, it easily follows from (2.2) the following expression for the Legendre function θL(ζL) of the Lagrangian system L,
3. G-ORBITS vs. ζL-ORBITS: CONSERVATIONS LAWS
The search of constants of motion corresponding to 1-parameter groups of symmetries in classical mechanics, has had since Emmy Noether, a fruitful history. We turn to the problem of symmetry groups in mechanical Lagrangian systems by considering groups of evolution of the Hamiltonian dynamical system
First of all we consider the Poisson structure associated to the symplectic phase space manifold (TM, wL). For every f ∈ C∞(TM), its Hamiltonian vector field is the unique vector field Xf on TM such that
It satisfies Leibniz’s rule
We say that f ∈ C∞(TM) is a conservation law for the symplectic dynamics
It is clear, by the Jacobi’s identity, that S is stable under Poisson bracket.
On account of this structure, we can settle this work on the essential consideration of 1-parameter groups of transformations which permute the classical trajectories of the Lagrangian system defined by
Under these assumptions, Prince and Crampin (one may also consult the beautiful presentation on the subject in de Leon-Rodrigues [6]) with an effective combination of the vertical lift Xv and the complete lift Xc of the vector field X on M, raise a theory of conserved quantities of a Lagrangian system, under the condition that
Our goal here is to find other conditions on the 1-parameter invariance groups, that submitted to the assumption (3.1) are able to generate first integrals on the trajectories of the Lagrangian system.
A natural condition, that comes from considering those transformations by diffeomorphisms of the Lagrangian L that lead to the same symplectic dynamics (see, for example, [1] or [2]), is
In such a case, we say that
As a direct consequence of this condition, we have
Theorem 3.1.
Let us consider a regular Lagrangian system
Proof. The assumption that the function θL(Xc) is a conservation law, means
In this way, by (3.1) we have
Now, by the Cartan formula
On the other hand, since by (3.3), the vector field Xc is the Hamiltonian vector corresponding to the function θL(Xc) the condition ζL {θL(Xc)} = 0 is equivalent to Xc(EL) = 0. In this way,
Conversely, if Xc {θL(ζL)} = 0 and XcL = 0 then
We shall finish this article with the following unexpected result.
Proposition 3.1.
With the previous notations, let us consider the Hamiltonian vector field Xc on TM,
Let Y be the unique vector field on TM such that iYwL = –θL Then
Proof. We shall prove, in a more general manner, that for a Hamiltonian vector field Xf, that is
Now
REFERENCES
Cite this article
TY - JOUR AU - Javier Pérez Álvare PY - 2020 DA - 2020/12/12 TI - Orbits and Lagrangian Symmetries on the Phase Space JO - Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physics SP - 205 EP - 208 VL - 28 IS - 2 SN - 1776-0852 UR - https://doi.org/10.2991/jnmp.k.201203.001 DO - 10.2991/jnmp.k.201203.001 ID - Álvare2020 ER -