A Comparative Study on Teaching Effects of Different Innovative Methods for Curriculum System: An Students' self-evaluation Study
- DOI
- 10.2991/seiem-16.2016.105How to use a DOI?
- Keywords
- TRIZ courses, Creative course, creativity self-evaluation, problem-solving ability
- Abstract
In order to test the feasibility of the curriculum system of TRIZ used in humanities and social science majors, compared with the traditional creativity developing, this study will test whether it is effective to cultivate students' creativity and to train their ability to solve problems. This study designs the randomly experimental targets in the two control groups for pretest and post-test. This study tests creative thinking and student self-evaluation questionnaire, and the result indicates that in terms of the pretest for the two groups of students the indicators have no significant difference. In light of the post-test, for the two groups of students, their creative thinking indicators have improved significantly. However, the differences between the experimental group and the control group are not significant. Finally, this study has discussed the value of TRIZ Course contained in Humanities and Social Science Teaching and addressed the needs to improve.
- Copyright
- © 2016, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.
- Open Access
- This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
Cite this article
TY - CONF AU - Lingling Luo AU - Na Wang AU - Ping Zhang AU - Chunfang Zhou PY - 2016/12 DA - 2016/12 TI - A Comparative Study on Teaching Effects of Different Innovative Methods for Curriculum System: An Students' self-evaluation Study BT - Proceedings of the 2016 International Seminar on Education Innovation and Economic Management (SEIEM 2016) PB - Atlantis Press SP - 408 EP - 412 SN - 2352-5398 UR - https://doi.org/10.2991/seiem-16.2016.105 DO - 10.2991/seiem-16.2016.105 ID - Luo2016/12 ER -