Artery Research

Volume 5, Issue 4, December 2011, Pages 181 - 181

P7.10 RENAL FUNCTION DOES NOT MODIFY PREDICTIVE VALUE OF CENTRAL PULSE PRESSURE AND PULSATILITY IN PATIENTS WITH CAD

Authors
P. Jankowski1, A. Bednarek1, M. Kloch-Badełek1, J. Wiliński1, L. Bryniarski1, D. Dudek2, D. Czarnecka1, K. Kawecka-Jaszcz1
1I Department of Cardiology and Hypertension, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
2II Department of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
Available Online 29 November 2011.
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.117How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Background: The differences between central and peripheral blood pressure (BP) values have been known for decades. Although the predictive value of central BP in coronary patients with impaired renal function has not been studied so far. Therefore, the aim of the study was to assess the influence of renal function on the predictive value of ascending aortic pulse pressure (PP) and pulsatility (the ratio of PP to mean BP) in patients with coronary artery disease.

Methods: The study group consisted of 755 patients (214 women and 545 men; mean age: 57.7±10.0 years) with preserved left ventricular function (EF>40%) undergoing coronary angiography. Demographic and clinical information as well as invasive ascending aortic BP were obtained at baseline. The follow-up was 53.1±18.7 months. The primary end point was: cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiac arrest or myocardial revascularization. The Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to assess the relation between BP and primary end point.

Results: The primary end point occurred in 152 (20.1%) patients whereas CV death, myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke in 79 (10.5%) subjects. Both ascending aortic PP (increase per 10 mmHg: HR 1.12 [95% CI 1.01–1.24]) and pulsatility (increase per 0.1: 1.18 [1.04–1.34]) predicted the risk of primary end point as well as of CV death, MI, or stroke (1.14 [1.00–1.33] and 1.30 [1.10–1.54], resp.). HRs according to the stage of chronic renal disease are presented in the table.

Conclusion: Renal function does not modify predictive value of central pulse pressure and pulsatility in patients with CAD.

GFR<60 ml/min/1.73m2 GFR 60–90 ml/min/1.73m2 GFR≥90 ml/min/1.73m2 P for interaction
Primary end point
Central PP 1.09 1.19 1.09 NS
Central pulsatility 1.07 1.30 1.12 NS
CV death, MI or stroke
Central PP 1.11 1.11 1.24 NS
Central pulsatility 1.37 1.32 1.32 NS

Values are hazard ratios for 10 mmHg increase in PP and 0.1 in pulsatility

Journal
Artery Research
Volume-Issue
5 - 4
Pages
181 - 181
Publication Date
2011/11/29
ISSN (Online)
1876-4401
ISSN (Print)
1872-9312
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.117How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Cite this article

TY  - JOUR
AU  - P. Jankowski
AU  - A. Bednarek
AU  - M. Kloch-Badełek
AU  - J. Wiliński
AU  - L. Bryniarski
AU  - D. Dudek
AU  - D. Czarnecka
AU  - K. Kawecka-Jaszcz
PY  - 2011
DA  - 2011/11/29
TI  - P7.10 RENAL FUNCTION DOES NOT MODIFY PREDICTIVE VALUE OF CENTRAL PULSE PRESSURE AND PULSATILITY IN PATIENTS WITH CAD
JO  - Artery Research
SP  - 181
EP  - 181
VL  - 5
IS  - 4
SN  - 1876-4401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.117
DO  - 10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.117
ID  - Jankowski2011
ER  -