Proceedings of the 2nd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2020)

Consumer Legal Protection for Mobile Phone Sales Based on Law Number 8 Year 1999 Concering Consumer Protection

Authors
Jeane Neltje Sally, Descar Kristian
Corresponding Author
Jeane Neltje Sally
Available Online 12 December 2020.
DOI
10.2991/assehr.k.201209.146How to use a DOI?
Keywords
legal certainty, consumer protection, instructions for use in Indonesian
Abstract

As a result of the lack of supervision and application of standards and the quality and quality of cellular telephone products, consumers sometimes do not get legal protection so that more and more cases occur in low economic communities buying reconditioned cellular phones at very cheap prices without obtaining instructions for the use of Indonesian if a when the cell phone is damaged. Implementation of standards and quality and product quality are regulated in UUPK. The Consumer Protection Act was formed with the aim of protecting consumers as written in Article 1 paragraph (1) of the Consumer Protection Act. The main issues are: 1. How is the legal protection for consumers for the purchase of cellular phones that do not include instructions for use in the Indonesian language based on Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection? 2. What is the responsibility of the business actor for the sale of cellular phones that do not include instructions for use in Indonesian according to Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection? The author examines these problems using normative legal research methods, legislation approaches, and case approaches. In the discussion, discussing the importance of using Indonesian in cellular telephone products in order to protect consumers and educate consumers of goods that have been purchased. The conclusion of this paper shows that the Judge’s Decision caused legal uncertainty because Article 32 of the Telecommunications Law does not regulate the obligations of business operators to include instructions for use in Indonesian on cellular phones. The Judge should have sentenced him with Article 62 of the UUPK for the sake of creating legal certainty which is one of the principles and objectives of the establishment of the UUPK in an effort to protect consumers.

Copyright
© 2020, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

Volume Title
Proceedings of the 2nd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2020)
Series
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research
Publication Date
12 December 2020
ISBN
10.2991/assehr.k.201209.146
ISSN
2352-5398
DOI
10.2991/assehr.k.201209.146How to use a DOI?
Copyright
© 2020, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Cite this article

TY  - CONF
AU  - Jeane Neltje Sally
AU  - Descar Kristian
PY  - 2020
DA  - 2020/12/12
TI  - Consumer Legal Protection for Mobile Phone Sales Based on Law Number 8 Year 1999 Concering Consumer Protection
BT  - Proceedings of the 2nd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2020)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 931
EP  - 936
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201209.146
DO  - 10.2991/assehr.k.201209.146
ID  - Sally2020
ER  -