The Problem of Chemical Castration Criminal Sanction Execution in Law Certainty Perspective

DOI

10.2991/assehr.k.201014.151How to use a DOI?

Keywords

Attorney Office, Executor, Chemical Castration, Medical Workers

Abstract

The problem departs from Court’s Verdict Number 69/Pid.sus/2019/PN.Mjk imposing chemical castration sanction. Thus, pros- and cons- arise related to who the executor of chemical castration is. This study was a normative research, with statute approach. The problem of research was the existence of chemical castration sanction implementation and institution authorized to do execution. The result of research showed that to ensure law certainty, the court’s verdict having had permanent legal power should be executed. To ensure the law certainty and society orderliness, a rule is required to implement the execution of chemical castration. As the executor of criminal verdict, the public prosecutor has no competency of doing chemical castration execution. Therefore, there should be coordination and cooperation with other institutions, i.e. health institution/medical workers or other relevant institutions as having been conducted in some states that have implemented chemical castration against the perpetrator of sexual abuse.

Copyright

© 2020, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Erma Rusdiana
AU  - Mayang Puspitasari Rohimanto
PY  - 2020
DA  - 2020/10/15
TI  - The Problem of Chemical Castration Criminal Sanction Execution in Law Certainty Perspective
BT  - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Social Sciences (ICSS 2020)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 697
EP  - 699
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201014.151
DO  - 10.2991/assehr.k.201014.151
ID  - Rusdiana2020
ER  -