Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Public Policy, Social Computing and Development (ICOPOSDEV 2021)

Perspective of Competition Law on Partnership of Palm Oil Company and Nucleus Estate

Authors
Ningum Natasya Sirait1, *, ningrum@usu.ac.id ningrum@gmail.com, Rosmalinda2, Mahmul Siregar3
1,2,3University Sumatera Utara
Corresponding Author
Available Online 15 February 2022.
DOI
10.2991/assehr.k.220204.032How to use a DOI?
Keywords
Legal; Partnership; Palm Oil; NSE Business; Competition
Abstract

Partnership is important in a business including the oil palm plantation. As a form of cooperation in business circle, partnership should be exist either directly or indirectly. Moreover, it must be applied in some principles such as mutual need, trust, strengthening, and benefit. Partnership should involve all categories of enterpreneurs-Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) actors and large businesses. Article 1 paragraph 13 of Law No. 20/2008 discusses on the Partnership. This topic is interesting due to the presence of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (Komisi Pengawasan Persaingan Usaha/KPPU) in the supervision of partnerships. This research raises a question, namely what is the legal issue concerning the role of KPPU in supervising the Partnership between Smallholders and Palm Oil Companies. This study analyzes laws and regulations such as (1) Law No. 20/2008 concerning MSME (2), Government Regulation No. 7/2021 concerning Ease, Protection, and Empowerment of Cooperatives and Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises. Medium. (3) Law No. 39/2014 concerning Plantations, and (4) Law No 11/2020 concerning Job Creation. The researcher also interviewed officer(s) of regional KPPU 1 and ATR-BPN in 4 districts in North Sumatra. The study found that the existence of the KPPU which has function(s) to oversee monopolistic practices and unfair business competition, also oversees the implementation of partnerships. This is regulated in PP 17/2013 which has been revoked by PP No. 7/2021. KPPU conducts supervision in coordination with related institutions such as ATR-BPN in the Plasma core partnership pattern. As conclusion, the existence of the KPPU in supervising the implementation of the Partnership after the fulfillment of the 20% partnership requirement to obtain a HGU permit from an oil palm company is a gap for unfair business competition. As for suggestions, KPPU should conduct intensive coordination with ATR BPN to optimize existing plasma core partnerships.

Copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Published by Atlantis Press SARL.
Open Access
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.

Download article (PDF)

Volume Title
Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Public Policy, Social Computing and Development (ICOPOSDEV 2021)
Series
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research
Publication Date
15 February 2022
ISBN
10.2991/assehr.k.220204.032
ISSN
2352-5398
DOI
10.2991/assehr.k.220204.032How to use a DOI?
Copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Published by Atlantis Press SARL.
Open Access
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.

Cite this article

TY  - CONF
AU  - Ningum Natasya Sirait
AU  - Rosmalinda
AU  - Mahmul Siregar
PY  - 2022
DA  - 2022/02/15
TI  - Perspective of Competition Law on Partnership of Palm Oil Company and Nucleus Estate
BT  - Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Public Policy, Social Computing and Development (ICOPOSDEV 2021)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 197
EP  - 204
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220204.032
DO  - 10.2991/assehr.k.220204.032
ID  - Sirait2022
ER  -