Philosophical Criticism of the Betrayal of the Criminal Law Rechtspersoon as a Legal Subject

DOI

10.2991/aebmr.k.200513.058How to use a DOI?

Keywords

civil procedure, domination, public law, criminal, rechtspersoon

Abstract

In every legal case, especially a case that is special in nature, always brings up two side by side. The hegemony of one field of law over other fields of law raises losses for those who experience dominance of the Law Enforcement Officials. The emergence of differences in understanding, in the end will only lead to interpretive authority. That is, the result of a valid interpretation is an interpretation that is revealed only by public authorization by utilizing power and authority. As a result, public law, in this case is criminal law, presupposes the status of the legal subject. Criminal law no longer matters whether it is a persoonor a recharge persoon. Although, the Supreme Court has issued Supreme Court Regulation No. 13 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Handling Corporate Crimes, but the interpretation of the Supreme Court Regulation is still returned to the interpreting public authority.

Copyright

© 2020, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Wibisono Oedoyo
AU  - Rocky Marbun
PY  - 2020
DA  - 2020/05/20
TI  - Philosophical Criticism of the Betrayal of the Criminal Law Rechtspersoon as a Legal Subject
BT  - Proceedings of the International Conference on Law, Economics and Health (ICLEH 2020)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 285
EP  - 291
SN  - 2352-5428
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200513.058
DO  - 10.2991/aebmr.k.200513.058
ID  - Oedoyo2020
ER  -