The Concept of Securitization and the Existing Problems of Liberalism

DOI

10.2991/978-2-38476-265-1_6How to use a DOI?

Keywords

Liberalism; Security theory; Critical thinking

Abstract

Different authors analyze the same theory differently. This paper will look at Moffette and Vadasaria’s and Lazell’s articles on the core theories of liberalism and compare and further interpret the different perspectives they hold as well as the style of writing of the two articles. At the same time, this paper utilizes critical theory to examine and further analyze two articles. In the end, it is found that M&V use a clearer article structure to explain that current liberalism lacks a focus on race and needs to be supplemented, whereas L’s article favors a traditional style in its framing, arguing that securitization studies need to apply liberal theory to governance at the global level as a means of using the doctrine to be widely applied and disseminated. Different authors analyze the same theory differently.

Copyright

© 2024 The Author(s)

Open Access

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Moqing Jia
PY  - 2024
DA  - 2024/07/18
TI  - The Concept of Securitization and the Existing Problems of Liberalism
BT  - Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language, Art and Cultural Exchange (ICLACE 2024)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 40
EP  - 46
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-265-1_6
DO  - 10.2991/978-2-38476-265-1_6
ID  - Jia2024
ER  -