Thoughts on Double Alleviation Policy: A Background-based International Comparison of Shadow-education Policies

DOI

10.2991/assehr.k.211220.464How to use a DOI?

Keywords

Double Alleviation Policy; Shadow Education; China; Korea; America

Abstract

The Chinese State Council announced Shuangjian Policy (aka. Double Alleviation Policy) intending to alleviate students’ pressure. The purpose of this conceptual article is to predict the possible consequences on Chinese tutoring institutions by conducting a comparative study of various educational policies confronting shadow education among Korea, the United States, and China. The theoretical framework adopts the policy-making circle (i.e. decision, implementation, and evaluation). The findings showed that China and Korea had placed strict restrictions on private tutoring, while the US administrator has joined supplemental tutoring’s efforts in the sphere of public education through collaboration with private sectors. Schooling concerns, private education’s socioeconomic repercussions, the state of the market economy, and traditional governmental accustoms in diverse contexts are all shown to have a substantial impact on educational policies concerning shadow education in different countries.

Copyright

© 2021 The Authors. Published by Atlantis Press SARL.

Open Access

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Sini Wu
PY  - 2021
DA  - 2021/12/24
TI  - Thoughts on Double Alleviation Policy: A Background-based International Comparison of Shadow-education Policies
BT  - Proceedings of the 2021 4th International Conference on Humanities Education and Social Sciences (ICHESS 2021)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 2686
EP  - 2694
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211220.464
DO  - 10.2991/assehr.k.211220.464
ID  - Wu2021
ER  -