Categorical Management of Faculty in High Education: a case of University of Queensland

DOI

10.2991/icaicte-15.2015.34How to use a DOI?

Keywords

Categorical Management of Faculty, Academic evaluation.

Abstract

This study introduced the detail of categorical management of faculty in the University of Queensland, which would provide potential suggestions for domestic universities in their reforms on faculty management. The results indicate: first, the University of Queensland adopts, the University of Queensland pay attention to both the processes and ultimate outcomes of faculties’ work. On the contrast, domestic universities often only pay attention to the outcomes. Given these, we argue several important points on faculty evaluation: 1.The evaluation should be more concrete and targeted. 2. The evaluation should be as simple as possible to operate whether it’s qualitative-oriented or qualitative-oriented. 3. To protect faculties’ academic freedom on the basis of fairness. 4. All constructive academic efforts should be included not only explicit academic achievements, but also the tacit academic creation.

Copyright

© 2015, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Chen Sichao
AU  - Ying Biao
AU  - Lv Chunfeng
AU  - Xu Qing
PY  - 2015/08
DA  - 2015/08
TI  - Categorical Management of Faculty in High Education: a case of University of Queensland
BT  - Proceedings of the 2015 3d International Conference on Advanced Information and Communication Technology for Education
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 143
EP  - 148
SN  - 2352-538X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/icaicte-15.2015.34
DO  - 10.2991/icaicte-15.2015.34
ID  - Sichao2015/08
ER  -