Practice-Led Fine Arts Doctorate: The Controversy on New Knowledge

DOI

10.2991/assehr.k.210106.070How to use a DOI?

Keywords

Practice-led Fine Arts Doctorate, tacit knowledge, encounter and recognition

Abstract

Although the current situations of Practice-led Fine Arts Doctorate courses in different countries are extremely different, it seems to be a trend that this course is becoming a kind of regularity in universities. However, debates on how this mode of research creates new knowledge, and whether this new mode of research creates new knowledge are still fierce. Among these debates, theories of tacit knowledge of encounter are significant. While defending the academic legitimacy of Practice-led Fine Arts Doctorate, they also provide new perspectives and possibilities on the connections between visual art and other subjects.

Copyright

© 2021, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Rongwei Zhang
PY  - 2021
DA  - 2021/01/06
TI  - Practice-Led Fine Arts Doctorate: The Controversy on New Knowledge
BT  - Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Arts, Design and Contemporary Education (ICADCE 2020)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 363
EP  - 367
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210106.070
DO  - 10.2991/assehr.k.210106.070
ID  - Zhang2021
ER  -