Comparison of Moving Average-Based, S Growth-Based, and AUF Rainfall-Induced Soil Erosion Area Models

DOI

10.2991/icache-15.2015.79How to use a DOI?

Keywords

Erosion experiment;S growth model; adaptive updating model; prediction model

Abstract

This paper gives the comparison of the moving average, S growth and adaptive updating forecasting(AUF) models based on the rainfall-induced soil erosion area experiment. The results show that (1) the average relative error of the moving average method is 5.7%–12.1%, while S growth model has an error of 3%–9.7%and average relative error of adaptive updating model is between 3.4%-9.6%. (2) the moving average method is easy to be constructed; the S growth model owns good physical meaning; (3) the AUF model is very reliable since it combines two models.

Copyright

© 2015, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Lin Chen
AU  - Nannan Ma
AU  - Yulong Chen
PY  - 2015/11
DA  - 2015/11
TI  - Comparison of Moving Average-Based, S Growth-Based, and AUF Rainfall-Induced Soil Erosion Area Models
BT  - Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Architectural, Civil and Hydraulics Engineering
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 409
EP  - 412
SN  - 2352-5401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/icache-15.2015.79
DO  - 10.2991/icache-15.2015.79
ID  - Chen2015/11
ER  -