Artery Research

Volume 26, Issue Supplement 1, December 2020, Pages S25 - S25

P.05 Development and Validation of a Novel Centroid Method for Estimating Effective Reflection Time

Authors
Avinash Kondiboyina1, 2, *, Joseph J Smolich1, 2, Michael MH Cheung1, 2, 3, Jonathan P Mynard1, 2, 3
1Murdoch Children’s Research Institute
2University of Melbourne
3Royal Children’s Hospital
*Corresponding author. Email: avinash.kondiboyina@mcri.edu.au
Corresponding Author
Avinash Kondiboyina
Available Online 31 December 2020.
DOI
10.2991/artres.k.201209.019How to use a DOI?
Keywords
Reflection-time; wave-tracking; wave-reflection; arterial-hemodynamics
Abstract

Background: The time at which reflected waves arrive at central arteries has an important influence on ventricular afterload. Current methods of estimating reflection time (RT), including zero-crossover [1], inflection-point [2], and foot methods [3], use only a single point on the pressure waveforms, and their accuracy is uncertain because no ground truth reflection time (GTRT) has been available. We here introduce a novel centroid method that accounts for the entire waveform and compare the accuracy of RT methods by comparison with a GTRT for the first time.

Methods: Using computational linear wave-tracking, we followed an impulse as it traversed through an anatomical model of the systemic arterial circulation; GTRT was calculated as the weighted mean arrival time of reflected waves at the inlet. Linear convolution of the resulting impulse response with a realistic input waveform (flow waveform multiplied by characteristic impedance) produced a pressure waveform that was separated into forward and backward components. The time difference between the centroids of the backward pressure and input waveforms was taken as RT in the centroid method. We also conducted a parameter sweep (n = 300) on the model to test the accuracy and robustness of the various methods.

Result: Compared to the zero-crossover, inflection-point, and foot methods, the centroid method estimated RT with the least mean difference to GTRT (104, 107, 171 vs. 8 ms; p < 0.001) and least standard deviation (34, 109, 97 vs. 28 ms).

Conclusion: The centroid method substantially improved accuracy and robustness for estimating RT compared with current methods.

Copyright
© 2020 Association for Research into Arterial Structure and Physiology. Publishing services by Atlantis Press International B.V.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Journal
Artery Research
Volume-Issue
26 - Supplement 1
Pages
S25 - S25
Publication Date
2020/12/31
ISSN (Online)
1876-4401
ISSN (Print)
1872-9312
DOI
10.2991/artres.k.201209.019How to use a DOI?
Copyright
© 2020 Association for Research into Arterial Structure and Physiology. Publishing services by Atlantis Press International B.V.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Cite this article

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Avinash Kondiboyina
AU  - Joseph J Smolich
AU  - Michael MH Cheung
AU  - Jonathan P Mynard
PY  - 2020
DA  - 2020/12/31
TI  - P.05 Development and Validation of a Novel Centroid Method for Estimating Effective Reflection Time
JO  - Artery Research
SP  - S25
EP  - S25
VL  - 26
IS  - Supplement 1
SN  - 1876-4401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/artres.k.201209.019
DO  - 10.2991/artres.k.201209.019
ID  - Kondiboyina2020
ER  -