Artery Research

Volume 12, Issue C, December 2015, Pages 21 - 21

P5.4 CENTRAL PRESSURE APPRAISAL: CLINICAL VALIDATION OF A SUBJECT-SPECIFIC MATHEMATICAL MODEL

Authors
Francesco Tosello2, Andrea Guala*1, Dario Leone2, Carlo Camporeale1, Giulia Bruno2, Luca Ridolfi1, Franco Veglio2, Alberto Milan2
1Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy
2University of Torino, Torino, Italy
Available Online 23 November 2015.
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2015.10.269How to use a DOI?
Abstract

Increased blood pressure represents a major cardiovascular risk factor for western populations. Usually blood pressure is measured peripherally, but current evidence suggested that central blood pressure better predicts cardiovascular events. However, central blood pressure measurement is not feasible in daily clinical practice. New instruments can estimate non-invasively central blood pressure from applanation tonometry at peripheral sites and transfer function. Accuracy of this evaluation has been questioned. Remarkable development in medical imaging and computation techniques granted the opportunity to explore mathematical models describing the cardiovascular functioning.

Aim of the present study is the clinical validation of a mathematical model for appraisal of central blood pressure from subject-specific non-invasive measurements (i.e. brachial pressure, age, height, weight, ESV, EDV, etc.). A total of 52 healthy young male were selected for the present study. Central pressures were estimated with subject-specific model and compared with a common non-invasive technique (Sphygmocor).

Model estimated systolic and diastolic blood pressure resulted to be significantly related to Sphygmocor central systolic (r 0.65 p <0.0001) and diastolic (r 0.84 p<0.0001) blood pressure. The model showed a significant over-estimation of systolic (+7.8 [−2.2;14] mmHg, p =0.0003) and under-estimation of diastolic (−3.2 [−7.5;1.6], p= 0.004) values.

In conclusion, the proposed mathematical model allows non-invasive prediction of central aortic pressure with good accuracy in more than one half of this population. Both the systematic over-estimation of aortic systolic pressure and the under-estimation of diastolic values compare well with the error reported by large meta-analysis when Sphygmocor is used with non-invasive calibration.

Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Journal
Artery Research
Volume-Issue
12 - C
Pages
21 - 21
Publication Date
2015/11/23
ISSN (Online)
1876-4401
ISSN (Print)
1872-9312
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2015.10.269How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Cite this article

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Francesco Tosello
AU  - Andrea Guala*
AU  - Dario Leone
AU  - Carlo Camporeale
AU  - Giulia Bruno
AU  - Luca Ridolfi
AU  - Franco Veglio
AU  - Alberto Milan
PY  - 2015
DA  - 2015/11/23
TI  - P5.4 CENTRAL PRESSURE APPRAISAL: CLINICAL VALIDATION OF A SUBJECT-SPECIFIC MATHEMATICAL MODEL
JO  - Artery Research
SP  - 21
EP  - 21
VL  - 12
IS  - C
SN  - 1876-4401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2015.10.269
DO  - 10.1016/j.artres.2015.10.269
ID  - Tosello2015
ER  -