Artery Research

Volume 12, Issue C, December 2015, Pages 14 - 15

P3.19 ASSESSMENT OF CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN HYPERTENSIVES WITH WHITE COAT EFFECT VS. PATIENTS WITH MASKED UNCONTROLLED HYPERTENSION

Authors
Anna Szyndler*, Beata Graff, Jacek Wolf, Katarzyna Polonis, Ewa Swierblewska, Katarzyna Kunicka, Marzena Chrostowska, Krzysztof Narkiewicz
Hypertension and Diabetology Department, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
Available Online 23 November 2015.
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2015.10.243How to use a DOI?
Abstract

Background: According to current ESH guidelines cardiovascular risk assessment is recommended in vast majority of patients with hypertension. However the groups of patients exist where risk assessment may be challenging.

Aim: The aim of our analysis was to compare risk factors, and target organ damage profiles in two groups of hypertensive patients with discrepant results in office vs. ambulatory blood pressure values.

Methods: From the outpatient hypertensive cohort (N=773) two groups were chosen – (1) white coat effect patients “WCHT” with systolic office blood pressure (OSBP) > 140 mmHg, and 24-hour systolic blood pressure < 130 mmHg; and (2) patients with normal OSBP but 24-hour SBP > 130 mmHg “MHTN”. Anthropometric measurements, together with basic cardiovascular risk factors and target organ damage assessment were performed.

Results: In univariate analyses age, weight, BMI, waist circumference, as well as biochemical markers (total cholesterol, HDL, LDL-C, triglycerides, glucose levels) were comparable between the groups (P=NS, for all comparisons). MHTN patients presented with more pronounced target organ damage markers (eGFR, LVH, IMT) except for cfPWV (11.4 vs. 9.6 m/s for WCHT vs. MHTN, respectively; P<0.001). Nevertheless, the multivariate analysis adjusted to the levels of OSBP, HR and age showed marked attenuation of the observed PWV difference (P=0.84 for the model).

Conclusion: Single time office pulse wave velocity measurement in white coat effect presenting patients may not be a sufficient tool for the accurate assessment of subclinical damage. Thus sequential PWV measurement or other methods should be considered in this group of patients.

Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Download article (PDF)
View full text (HTML)

Journal
Artery Research
Volume-Issue
12 - C
Pages
14 - 15
Publication Date
2015/11/23
ISSN (Online)
1876-4401
ISSN (Print)
1872-9312
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2015.10.243How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Cite this article

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Anna Szyndler*
AU  - Beata Graff
AU  - Jacek Wolf
AU  - Katarzyna Polonis
AU  - Ewa Swierblewska
AU  - Katarzyna Kunicka
AU  - Marzena Chrostowska
AU  - Krzysztof Narkiewicz
PY  - 2015
DA  - 2015/11/23
TI  - P3.19 ASSESSMENT OF CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN HYPERTENSIVES WITH WHITE COAT EFFECT VS. PATIENTS WITH MASKED UNCONTROLLED HYPERTENSION
JO  - Artery Research
SP  - 14
EP  - 15
VL  - 12
IS  - C
SN  - 1876-4401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2015.10.243
DO  - 10.1016/j.artres.2015.10.243
ID  - Szyndler*2015
ER  -