The comparison of decentralized and centralized structure of network communication in different application fields

DOI

10.2991/msie-19.2020.10How to use a DOI?

Keywords

decentralized architecture, centralized architecture, gossip algorithm, P2P network

Abstract

Since P2P is hypothetical expected to be a distributed network, in most cases the mode needs centralization through a set of servers. According to Vocal (2015), the P2P mode is an integral component in defining decentralized and centralized architectures with the two approaches offering varying services in the network infrastructure[12]. A single database plan makes the centralized system more manageable and highly reliable for enhanced consistency, rationality, and data soundness. A key feature of the centralized architecture is that index servers are usually utilized in preserving shared files directory as stowed across a network [7]. Such a design makes it easier to search into the centralized directory when seeking for the desired item. Due to the ability of the decentralized architecture to offer secure transactions and safer exchange of health information, such a system has proven essential in promoting telemedicine.

Copyright

© 2020, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Zeyu Xi
PY  - 2020/01
DA  - 2020/01
TI  - The comparison of decentralized and centralized structure of network communication in different application fields
BT  - Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Management Science and Industrial Economy (MSIE 2019)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 50
EP  - 54
SN  - 2352-5428
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/msie-19.2020.10
DO  - 10.2991/msie-19.2020.10
ID  - Xi2020/01
ER  -