Construction of Ratio Decidendi Constitutional Judges to Maintain the Authority of the Indonesian Constitution

DOI

10.2991/assehr.k.211014.057How to use a DOI?

Keywords

Authority, Guard, Judge, Constitution, Justice, Interpretation

Abstract

In general, every judge who will make a judgement must be preceded by or formed around a number of factors. A Constitutional judge’s arguments in deciding a case that has been brought before him is based on legal grounds. The “ratio decidendi” became a constructive means of constructing these legal considerations. Assume the constitutional judges’ legal arguments are invalid and unsuitable. In that circumstance, the people seeking justice or the general public have the right to decide whether the decision is just or proper. If the constitutional judges are doing their jobs correctly, they should be appointed as guardians of the Indonesian constitution’s privileges.

Copyright

© 2021, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Siti Marwiyah
PY  - 2021
DA  - 2021/10/16
TI  - Construction of Ratio Decidendi Constitutional Judges to Maintain the Authority of the Indonesian Constitution
BT  - Proceedings of the International Conference on Environmental and Energy Policy (ICEEP 2021)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 264
EP  - 268
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211014.057
DO  - 10.2991/assehr.k.211014.057
ID  - Marwiyah2021
ER  -