Improving performances in a company when collective strategy comes up against individual interests

DOI

10.2991/eusflat.2011.74How to use a DOI?

Keywords

industrial performances, argumentation, multi criteria improvement, debate modelling, qualitative model.

Abstract

In the current industrial context, strategies intended to bring about continuous improvement have to include the multi-criteria performance expression aspects. In complex systems, many actions may be envisaged to achieve the required levels of performance. A fuzzy representation is used to model the relationships between objectives and actions. Mostly, the potential improvement actions are distributed into several departments of a company. Then, the departments have to enter into negotiations to allocate actions responsibility and share the budget granted by the direction. Lots of interest conflicts may occur. An argumentation framework is proposed to model this argumented negotiation for improvement design.

Copyright

© 2011, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Abdelhak Imoussaten
AU  - Francois Trousset
AU  - Jacky Montmain
PY  - 2011/08
DA  - 2011/08
TI  - Improving performances in a company when collective strategy comes up against individual interests
BT  - Proceedings of the 7th conference of the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology (EUSFLAT-11)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 904
EP  - 911
SN  - 1951-6851
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/eusflat.2011.74
DO  - 10.2991/eusflat.2011.74
ID  - Imoussaten2011/08
ER  -