Artery Research

Volume 7, Issue 3-4, September 2013, Pages 122 - 122

P2.11 THE IMPACT OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AND PACEMAKERS ON ACCURACY OF CENTRAL BLOOD PRESSURE MEASURED BY A NOVEL CUFF-BASED TECHNIQUE

Authors
Z. Sabahi1, M. Butlin2, C. Yeung1, A.P. Avolio2, E. Barin1
1Macquarie University Hospital and Clinic, Sydney, Australia
2Australian School of Advanced Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
Available Online 11 November 2013.
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2013.10.073How to use a DOI?
Abstract

Background: Non-invasive measurement of Central Blood Pressure (CBP) in the clinic setting is the advantage of the validated, tonometer-based SphygmoCor device. Recently, a novel brachial cuff-based SphygmoCor device (XCEL) has been tested and validated against the tonometer-based method of CBP measurement. We investigated the accuracy of the XCEL measurements in patients with Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and pacemakers.

Methods: Group demographics are listed in the Table. Tonometric and cuff-based assessment of CBP was made in triplicate in a randomized fashion after a period of seated acclimatization. The difference in central systolic (cSBP), diastolic (cDBP), pulse pressure (cPP) and augmentation index normalised to a heart rate of 75 beats/min (AIx75) were analysed. The agreement between parameters for each of these two non-invasive devices was evaluated using Student’s paired t-tests and the Bland-Altman method.

Results: The difference between cSBP, cDBP, PP and AIx75 measured on the two devices in all groups is summarized in the Table. The mean and standard deviation of the difference of blood pressure values for each group were within the limits of international guidelines for blood pressure measurement (Table).

Conclusion: The cuff-based, SphygmoCor XCEL technique for non-invasive measurement of central blood pressure parameters has good agreement with the tonometer-based SphygmoCor device in patients with AF or pacemakers and could be used in routine evaluation of such patients in cardiac clinics.

AF group Pacemaker group Without AF/pacemaker
n 14 23 146
Men 8 13 123
Age (years) 76±11 79±10 65±16
Brachial SBP (mmHg) 121±15 129±17 129±16
Brachial DBP (mmHg) 68±11 69±7 71±10
Heart rate (bpm) 68±12 65±10 67±11
Mean difference between devices of:
cSBP (mmHg) −4.2±7.1* −0.5±6.6 −0.6±6.3
cDBP (mmHg) −3.8±5.9* −2.3±3.1** −1.5±3.8***
cPP (mmHg) −0.7±8.9 1.5±5.6 1.0±5.7*
Aix75 (%) −5.6±9.7 −3.1±7.6 −3.5±9.1***
*

p<0.05,

**

p<0.01,

***

p<0.001

Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Journal
Artery Research
Volume-Issue
7 - 3-4
Pages
122 - 122
Publication Date
2013/11/11
ISSN (Online)
1876-4401
ISSN (Print)
1872-9312
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2013.10.073How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Cite this article

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Z. Sabahi
AU  - M. Butlin
AU  - C. Yeung
AU  - A.P. Avolio
AU  - E. Barin
PY  - 2013
DA  - 2013/11/11
TI  - P2.11 THE IMPACT OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AND PACEMAKERS ON ACCURACY OF CENTRAL BLOOD PRESSURE MEASURED BY A NOVEL CUFF-BASED TECHNIQUE
JO  - Artery Research
SP  - 122
EP  - 122
VL  - 7
IS  - 3-4
SN  - 1876-4401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2013.10.073
DO  - 10.1016/j.artres.2013.10.073
ID  - Sabahi2013
ER  -