Artery Research

Volume 4, Issue 4, December 2010, Pages 160 - 160

P3.04 IS MALADAPTIVE CAROTID REMODELING A FEATURE OF TYPE 2 DIABETES?

Authors
R.M. Bruno1, E. Bianchini2, G. Cartoni1, F. Stea1, G. Penno1, S. Del Prato1, S. Taddei1, L. Ghiadoni1
1University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
2National Research Council, Pisa, Italy
Available Online 2 December 2010.
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2010.10.047How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

A maladaptive carotid remodeling was described in type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, it is still unknown whether it is a feature of diabetes per se, or rather a consequence of the frequent comorbidity with hypertension. We therefore studied the impact of diabetes, hypertension, and their combination on carotid geometry and remodeling, recruiting to this aim 139 subjects (31 normotensives-NT, 38 hypertensives-HT, 24 diabetic normotensives-DMNT, and 46 diabetic hypertensives-DMHT). Common carotid diameter, intima-media thickness (IMT) and distension were determined using a real-time echo-tracking system “Carotid Studio”. Local pulse pressure was obtained by applanation tonometry. Carotid static and pulsatile circumferential wall stress was calculated by Lamé equations. IMT was increasingly higher in the four groups, reaching the highest value in DMHT. As compared to NT, carotid lumen diameter was increased in HT and DMHT, but not in DMNT. HT showed significantly higher circumferential static wall stress than DMHT, while DMNT and NT had similar and significantly lower values. Carotid pulse pressure was similarly increased in DMHT and HT. In a logistic regression model adjusted for confounders, hypertension carried an increased risk (OR 2.33; CI-95% 1.02–5.63) of a widened lumen diameter, whereas diabetes carried an increased risk of IMT above the median value (OR2.49; 1.09–5.68). Hypertension, but not diabetes, was associated to an increased static and pulsatile stress (OR7.74; 2.76–21.72, and 4.86; 1.95–12.10). In conclusion, maladaptive remodeling, previously reported in diabetic patients, is conceivably attributable to the concomitant presence of hypertension.

Parameter NT HT DMNT DMHT p (trend)
Lumen diameter (mm) 5.6±1.0 6.3±1.1* 5.9±0.6 6.3±1.1* 0.02
IMT (mm) 0.72±0.09 0.76±0.18 0.78±0.13* 0.81±0.14* 0.04
Static wall stress (kPa) 48.7±12.7 60.4±13.3*# 48.8±12.6 54.6±12.2* 0.001
Pulsatile wall stress (kPa) 27.0±6.2 36.0±12.3* 27.6±6.3 32.5±9.0* 0.001
Pulse pressure (mmHg) 43.6±8.9 54.2±15.9* 44.7±8.9 53.8±11.8* <0.001
*

p<0.05 vs NT;

p<0.05 vs HT;

p<0.05 vs DMNT;

#

p<0.05 vs DMHT.

Journal
Artery Research
Volume-Issue
4 - 4
Pages
160 - 160
Publication Date
2010/12/02
ISSN (Online)
1876-4401
ISSN (Print)
1872-9312
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2010.10.047How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Cite this article

TY  - JOUR
AU  - R.M. Bruno
AU  - E. Bianchini
AU  - G. Cartoni
AU  - F. Stea
AU  - G. Penno
AU  - S. Del Prato
AU  - S. Taddei
AU  - L. Ghiadoni
PY  - 2010
DA  - 2010/12/02
TI  - P3.04 IS MALADAPTIVE CAROTID REMODELING A FEATURE OF TYPE 2 DIABETES?
JO  - Artery Research
SP  - 160
EP  - 160
VL  - 4
IS  - 4
SN  - 1876-4401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2010.10.047
DO  - 10.1016/j.artres.2010.10.047
ID  - Bruno2010
ER  -