Artery Research

Volume 3, Issue 3, September 2009, Pages 97 - 98

14. USING CENTRAL BLOOD PRESSURE TO GUIDE THERAPY IN HYPERTENSION: BP GUIDE STUDY DESIGN AND INITIAL FINDINGS

Authors
James E. Sharman1, 2, Michael Stowasser1, 3, Deborah T. Gilroy1, Thomas H. Marwick1
1Department of Medicine University of Queensland
2Menzies Research Institute, Tasmania
3Endocrine Hypertension Research Centre, Greenslopes & Princess Alexandra Hospitals, Brisbane, Australia
Available Online 31 October 2009.
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2009.06.028How to use a DOI?
Abstract

Background: Estimated central blood pressure (BP) predicts cardiovascular mortality independent of brachial BP, but whether central BP may be useful in clinical practice is unknown. This study aimed to test the value of central BP as a management tool for physicians treating patients with essential hypertension.

Methods: Patients with hypertension (n=84; 61±8 years) were randomised to 12 months of treatment decisions guided by usual care (UC, n=39) or, in addition, by central BP (CBP, n=45; based on age and gender-specific normal central systolic BP [SBP] values). Titration recommendations were provided to each patient’s general practitioner, as well as the patient themselves. Relevant clinical information (eg left ventricular [LV] mass, blood biochemistry and symptoms) were considered when making titration recommendations in all patients. Central BP was estimated by SphygmoCor 8.0. Primary outcome measures were; 1) change in LV mass 2) use of medication and 3) quality of life. We hypothesized that there will be no significant difference in LV mass between groups (study powered for equivalence). However, it was expected that there will be significantly less use of medication and improved quality of life in the CBP group because more appropriate titration choices will be made to maintain normal central SBP.

Results: Baseline LV mass index (CBP, 27.6±5.7 v±UC, 29.7±5.9g/m2.7), brachial SBP (CBP, 130±14 v UC 130±14 mmHg) and central SBP (CBP, 118±13 v UC 118±15 mmHg) were similar between groups (P>0.05 for all). However, in the CBP group, 33% (n=15) received a recommendation to reduce medication, whilst there were 3% (n=1) in the UC group (P=0.001). Moreover, 8 CBP patients were recommended to cease antihypertensive medication but maintained normal BP, indicating that they may have been incorrectly diagnosed with hypertension and unnecessarily taking medication based on brachial BP assessments.

Conclusion: Therapeutic decisions based on CBP are different from those based on standard BP. Follow up data and final results (N=312) are expected in 2011.

Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Download article (PDF)
View full text (HTML)

Journal
Artery Research
Volume-Issue
3 - 3
Pages
97 - 98
Publication Date
2009/10/31
ISSN (Online)
1876-4401
ISSN (Print)
1872-9312
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2009.06.028How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Cite this article

TY  - JOUR
AU  - James E. Sharman
AU  - Michael Stowasser
AU  - Deborah T. Gilroy
AU  - Thomas H. Marwick
PY  - 2009
DA  - 2009/10/31
TI  - 14. USING CENTRAL BLOOD PRESSURE TO GUIDE THERAPY IN HYPERTENSION: BP GUIDE STUDY DESIGN AND INITIAL FINDINGS
JO  - Artery Research
SP  - 97
EP  - 98
VL  - 3
IS  - 3
SN  - 1876-4401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2009.06.028
DO  - 10.1016/j.artres.2009.06.028
ID  - Sharman2009
ER  -