Artery Research

Volume 8, Issue 3, September 2014, Pages 115 - 118

Endothelin-1 system activity in adults with borderline high ldl-cholesterol

Authors
Kyle J. Diehla, Brian L. Stauffera, b, c, Jared J. Greinera, Christopher A. DeSouzaa, b, *
aIntegrative Vascular Biology Laboratory, Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
bDepartment of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver and the Health Sciences Center, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
cDenver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO 80204, USA
*Corresponding author. Integrative Vascular Biology Laboratory, Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado, 354 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309, USA. Tel.: +1 (303) 492 2988; fax: +1 (303) 492 6778. E-mail address: desouzac@colorado.edu (C.A. DeSouza).
Corresponding Author
Christopher A. DeSouza
Received 12 July 2013, Revised 4 February 2014, Accepted 24 March 2014, Available Online 18 April 2014.
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2014.03.002How to use a DOI?
Keywords
Endothelin-1; Vasoconstriction; LDL-cholesterol; Endothelium
Abstract

Background: Modest elevations in plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol have been shown to confer a significant increase in cardiovascular risk. Endothelin (ET)-1 is a vasoconstrictor peptide with proatherogenic properties. The experimental aim of this study was to determine whether ET-1 system activity is elevated in adults with borderline high LDL-cholesterol, independent of other cardiometabolic abnormalities.

Methods: Forearm blood flow (FBF; plethysmography) responses to intra-arterial infusion of ET-1, selective ETA receptor blockade (BQ-123), and non-selective ETA/B blockade (BQ-123 + BQ-788) were determined in 40 middle-aged and older adults (45–70 years): 20 with optimal/near optimal LDL-cholesterol (<3.4 mmol/L) and 20 with borderline-high LDL-cholesterol (3.4–4.1 mmol/L).

Results: Both groups demonstrated a similar, non-significant (∼10%) reduction in FBF to ET-1. BQ-123 and BQ-123 + 788 elicited a modest, but significant, increase in FBF (∼15–20%) in each group. However, there were no group differences in the FBF responses to either selective ETA or non-selective ETA/B receptor antagonism.

Conclusion: Borderline-high LDL-C is not associated with increased ET-1 mediated vasoconstrictor tone. Disrupted ET-1 system activity may not contribute to the increased cardiovascular risk burden with borderline-high LDL-cholesterol.

Copyright
© 2014 Association for Research into Arterial Structure and Physiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Introduction

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol is a major atherogenic fraction of total cholesterol1,2 and an important predictor of myocardial infarction in middle-aged adults.3 In fact, the risk of cardiovascular disease is estimated to increase by ∼30% for every 30 mg/dL rise in plasma LDL-cholesterol concentration, suggesting increased cardiovascular risk burden at levels below the clinically recognized elevated range of >130 mg/dL.1 Indeed, the relative risk of heart disease is nearly two-fold higher in adults with borderline high LDL-cholesterol (3.4–4.1 mmol/L [30–159 mg/mL]) compared with adults with optimal/near optimal LDL-cholesterol levels (<3.4 mmol/L [130 mg/dL]).1 Moreover, nearly 40% of the adults in the United States have LDL-cholesterol levels in the borderline high range. Thus, understanding the mechanisms involved with the increased vascular risk with borderline high LDL-cholesterol has great public health importance.

Endothelin (ET-1)-1 is a powerful vasoconstrictor peptide that in addition to contributing to the regulation of vascular tone is also involved in the development and progression of atherosclerotic vascular disease.4,5 Indeed, enhanced ET-1 system activity elicits a proinflammatory vascular phenotype and ET-1 immunoreactivity is prominent in the walls of atherosclerotic human vessels.6,7 Moreover, ET-1 promotes fibrous tissue formation and inhibits endothelial nitric oxide synthesis.8,9 Increased ET-1 vasoconstrictor tone is a common characteristic of numerous cardiovascular conditions and risk factors,1012 including clinical hypercholesterolemia.13 Whether this vascular impairment is already apparent in the borderline-high cholesterolemic state with its corresponding increase in vascular risk is unknown.

Accordingly, the experimental aim of this study was to determine whether ET-1 system activity is elevated in adults with borderline high LDL-cholesterol, independent of other cardiometabolic abnormalities. If so, this may contribute mechanistically to endovascular dysfunction and increased cardiovascular risk in this population.

Methods

Subjects

Forty, sedentary middle-aged adults were studied: 20 with optimal/near optimal LDL-C (<130 mg/dL) and 20 with borderline-high LDL-C (130–159 mg/dL).14 All subjects were sedentary, non-obese, non-smokers, normotensive, non-medicated (including vitamins) and free of overt cardiovascular disease as assessed by physical examination, fasting blood chemistries and electrocardiogram and blood pressure at rest and during incremental exercise performed to volitional exhaustion. All women were at least 1 year postmenopausal and had never taken or had discontinued use of hormone replacement therapy at least 1 year before the start of the study. Written informed consent was obtained according to the guidelines of the University of Colorado at Boulder.

Intra-arterial infusion protocol

All of the studies were performed between 7 AM and 10 AM after a 12-h overnight fast in a temperature-controlled room as previously described.15 Briefly, a 5-cm, 20-gauge catheter was inserted into the brachial artery of the nondominant arm under local anesthesia (1% lidocaine). Forearm blood flow (FBF) at rest and in response to each pharmacological agent was measured by strain-gauge venous occlusion plethysmography (D.E. Hokanson, Bellevue, Washington). To rule out the possibility of nonspecific group differences to vasoconstrictor agents, vascular responses to norepinephrine were determined. Norepinephrine was infused at a rate of 260 pmol/min for 5 min, and FBF was measured during the last 3 min. After a 20-min rest period to allow FBF to return to baseline levels, ET-1 (Clinalfa, AG) was infused at a rate of 5 pmol/min for 20 min, and FBF was measured during the last 3 min. After a 30-min rest period to allow resting FBF to return to baseline, BQ-123 (Clinalfa, AG), a selective ETA receptor antagonist, was infused at a rate of 100 nmol/min for 60 min. FBF was measured every 10 min throughout the infusion period. After 60 min of BQ-123 infusion, FBF was measured every 10 min during the combined infusion of BQ-123 and BQ-788. BQ-788, a selective ETB receptor antagonist, was infused at a rate 50 nmol/min for 60 min.

Statistical analysis

Differences in subject baseline characteristics and the magnitude of change in FBF to norepinephrine and ET-1 were determined by between-groups analysis of variance (ANOVA). Group differences in FBF responses to BQ-123 and BQ-123+BQ-788 were determined by repeated-measures ANOVA. There were no significant gender interactions, therefore the data were pooled and presented together. Data expressed as means ±SEM. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Selected subject characteristics are presented in Table 1. By design, total cholesterol and LDL-C levels were the only variables significantly different (p < 0.05) between the groups. The vasoconstrictor response to norepinephrine was not significantly different between the groups optimal/near optimal (from 4.0 ± 0.3 to 3.0 ± 0.3 mL/100 mL tissue/min) and borderline high (from 4.1 ± 0.3 to 3.0 ± 0.2 mL/100 mL tissue/min) LDL-C groups. Resting FBF was reduced by ∼10% in response to ET-1 in both the optimal/near optimal (from 4.0 ± 0.2 to 3.6 ± 0.2 mL/100 mL tissue/min) and borderline high (from 3.9 ± 0.2 to 3.6 ± 0.3 mL/100 mL tissue/min) LDL-C groups (Fig. 1). In response to BQ-123, there was a significant increase in FBF (∼15%) from baseline in both groups. The addition of BQ-788 did not significantly alter FBF in either group (Fig. 1). Importantly, there were no group differences in FBF responses to either BQ-123 (P = 0.77) or BQ-123 + BQ-788 (P = 0.51).

Figure 1

Forearm blood flow response to ET-1 (top panel), BQ-123, selective ETA receptor antagonism (middle panel) and BQ-123 + BQ-788, ETA and ETB receptor blockade (bottom panel) in the optimal/near optimal LDL-C and borderline high LDL-C groups.

Variable Optimal/near optimal LDL-C
(n = 20)
Borderline-high LDL-C
(n = 20)
Age, yr 59 ± 2 59 ± 2
Sex, M/F 11/9 11/9
Body mass, kg 80.5 ± 3.5 76.9 ± 3.6
BMI, kg/m2 27.2 ± 0.8 26.3 ± 0.9
Body fat, % 34.1 ± 2.3 34.1 ± 1.8
Waist circumference, cm 91.8 ± 2.7 88.0 ± 3.0
Systolic BP, mmHg 126 ± 2 122 ± 2
Diastolic BP, mmHg 78 ± 1 78 ± 2
Total cholesterol, mmol/L 4.7 ± 0.1 5.6 ± 0.1*
LDL-cholesterol, mmol/L 2.7 ± 0.1 3.7 ± 0.1*
HDL-cholesterol, mmol/L 1.4 ± 0.1 1.3 ± 0.1
Triglycerides, mmol/L 1.2 ± 0.1 1.4 ± 0.1
Glucose, mmol/L 5.2 ± 0.1 5.1 ± 0.1
Insulin, pmol/L 38.1 ± 4.9 40.2 ± 4.8

BMI indicates body mass index; BP, blood pressure; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; Values are mean ±SEM.

*

P < 0.05 vs. optimal/near optimal LDL-C.

Table 1

Selected subject characteristics.

Discussion

The ET-1 system not only plays a central role in the regulation of vascular tone, but is also involved in the etiology of atherosclerotic vascular disease.4,15 The primary finding of the present study is that borderline-high LDL-cholesterol is not associated with enhanced ET-1 system activity. Indeed, forearm vascular responses to exogenous ET-1, selective ETA receptor antagonism and non-selective ETA/B receptor blockade were almost identical between adults with LDL-cholesterol in the optimal/near optimal and borderline-high levels.

Cardillo and colleagues13 were the first to demonstrate a relation between hypercholesterolemia and ET-1 system activity. In a seminal study, employing the same isolated forearm model as used herein, Cardillo et al.13 reported that ETA receptor-mediated ET-1 vasoconstrictor tone was significantly elevated in middle-aged adults with high LDL-cholesterol concentrations (5.8 ± 0.2 mmol/L [223 ± 9 mg/dL]). The results of the present study compliment and extend these findings by demonstrating that ET-1 vasoconstrictor is not elevated at subclinical levels of LDL-cholesterol. This finding is in contrast to conditions such prehypertension12 and impaired fasting glucose16 where ET-1-mediated vasoconstrictor tone is already elevated to comparable levels seen with clinical hypertension17 and overt diabetes.18 Interestingly, borderline high LDL-cholesterol is associated with diminished nitric oxide-mediated endothelial vasodilation,19 thus modest elevations in LDL-cholesterol appear to have differential effects on two key elements of endothelial vasomotor regulation. Moreover, given the inhibitory interaction between ET-1 and nitric oxide,20 lack of enhanced ET-1 system activity argues against an ET-1-related mechanism underlying endothelial vasodilator dysfunction with borderline high LDL-cholesterol.

It should be noted that we did not measure circulating plasma concentrations of ET-1. Since the vast majority of ET-1 produced by the endothelium (>80%) is released towards the vascular smooth,21 circulating levels of ET-1 do not appropriately reflect the vascular effects of the peptide.22 Rather, we employed a pharmacological approach involving the intra-arterial infusion of exogenous ET-1 and ET receptor antagonists providing a more direct and specific biological assessment of ET-1 system activity in vivo.13,17

In conclusion, the results of the present study demonstrate that borderline high LDL-cholesterol is not associated with increased ET-1 vasoconstrictor activity. Although elevations in LDL-cholesterol in the borderline high range is linked with both diminished endothelial vasodilator function19,23 and increased cardiovascular risk burden,1 disrupted ET-1 system activity does not appear to be a contributing factor.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the subjects who participated in this study. This study was supported by National Institutes of Health awards HL077450, HL076434, and UL1 TR000154, American Heart Association awards 0840167N and 09PRE2230382.

References

1.SM Grundy, JI Cleeman, CN Merz, HB Brewer Jr, LT Clark, DB Hunninghake, et al., Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines, J Am Coll Cardiol, Vol. 44, 2004, pp. 720-32.
9.M Lavallee, M Takamura, P Parent, and E Thorin, Crosstalk between endothelin and nitric oxide in the control of vascular tone, Heart Fail Rev, Vol. 6, 2001, pp. 265-76.
13.C Cardillo, C Kilcoyne, R Cannon, and J Panza, Increased activity of endougenous endothelin in patients with hypercholesterolemia, J Am Coll Cardiol, Vol. 36, 2000, pp. 1483-8.
21.OF Wagner, G Christ, J Wojta, H Vierhapper, S Parzer, PJ Nowotny, et al., Polar secretion of endothelin-1 by cultured endothelial cells, J Biol Chem, Vol. 267, 1992, pp. 16066-8.
22.EL Schiffrin, Vascular endothelin in hypertension, Vasc Pharmacol, Vol. 43, 2005, pp. 19-29. doi:S1537-1891.
Journal
Artery Research
Volume-Issue
8 - 3
Pages
115 - 118
Publication Date
2014/04/18
ISSN (Online)
1876-4401
ISSN (Print)
1872-9312
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2014.03.002How to use a DOI?
Copyright
© 2014 Association for Research into Arterial Structure and Physiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Cite this article

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kyle J. Diehl
AU  - Brian L. Stauffer
AU  - Jared J. Greiner
AU  - Christopher A. DeSouza
PY  - 2014
DA  - 2014/04/18
TI  - Endothelin-1 system activity in adults with borderline high ldl-cholesterol
JO  - Artery Research
SP  - 115
EP  - 118
VL  - 8
IS  - 3
SN  - 1876-4401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2014.03.002
DO  - 10.1016/j.artres.2014.03.002
ID  - Diehl2014
ER  -